Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Vitaliy Sachko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Almeida vs Sachko analysis and find out who is favored!
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Vitaliy Sachko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Almeida has won 47.4% of points on his second serve, while Sachko has won 48.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Almeida, in recent form, has won 50.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sachko has won 49.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.4% and 32.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Almeida has saved 58.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sachko has saved 65.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Almeida has won 49.12% of matches played (W/L 28/ 29), with Sachko winning 54.55% (W/L 36/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Almeida has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 154/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Sachko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 185/ 129), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Almeida has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 27), where as Sachko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.77% of matches (W/L 29/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Almeida winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Almeida winning 2 and Sachko winning 1. The last match between Almeida and Sachko was at the Prostejov Challenger, 05-06-2023, Q3, Clay with Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:34:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Almeida and Sachko have played a deciding set 1 times, with Almeida winning 1 times and Sachko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Almeida winning 0, and Sachko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Almeida has played against opponents with an average rank of 297.84 while Sachko has played against players with an average rank of 251.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Almeida has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sachko has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Almeida has converted 43.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sachko has converted 43.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Almeida 1 - 0 Sachko
273
Rank
190
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
181
Rank
156
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
59% (176-122)
Career Total W/L
58% (303-217)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$57,890
Career Prize Money
$154,400
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Vitaliy Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:34:7 | 2:34:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (65/93) | 61% (52/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (38/65) | 48% (25/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (14/28) | 45% (15/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (45/85) | 44% (41/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-0 7-5 |
Stats 
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Vitaliy Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 45% (5/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (24/17) | 45% (10/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (207/185) | 51% (110/106) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:4 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.67 | 395.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (827/1337) | 64% (481/755) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (556/827) | 65% (312/481) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (244/510) | 48% (132/274) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (59/122) | 42% (33/78) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (539/1274) | 41% (286/700) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (8/6) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 56% (5/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 14% (7/1) |
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
44
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Liam Draxl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
41%
(
28 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Andrea Collarini
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Vitaliy Sachko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Francesco Passaro
63%
(
77 of
122)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
52 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
11
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Denis Yevseyev
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
17 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Almeida Vs Sachko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
