Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Renzo Olivo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
W L W W L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Almeida 2 - 0 Olivo
They have played 5 sets in total, with Almeida winning 4 and Olivo winning 1. The last match between Almeida and Olivo was at the Santiago Challenger, 12-03-2025, Second, Clay with Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | 2 |
| Renzo Olivo | 0 |
Santiago Challenger(12-03-2025)
6
7
6
2
6
1
| Almeida | Stats | Olivo |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (10-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (13-12) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 322 | Ranking | 359 |
| 190 | Highest Rank | 78 |
| 24 | Age | 33 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 8 |
| 59% (214-149) | Career Total W/L | 51% (468-441) |
| $57,890 | Career Prize Money | $517,870 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 31 | Games Won | 19 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:16:48 | Average Match Time | 2:16:48 |
| 65% (101/156) | 1st Serve % | 60% (91/151) |
| 66% (67/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (53/91) |
| 62% (34/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (30/60) |
| 48% (11/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 45% (68/151) | Return Points Win % | 35% (55/156) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Matias Soto
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Facundo Mena
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
73 of
127)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Renzo Olivo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Renzo Olivo
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
9
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Hernan Casanova
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
90%
(
73 of
81)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Renzo Olivo
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Nicolas Villalon
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Renzo Olivo
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Bernard Tomic
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Max Wiskandt
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
75 of
99)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
45 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
66%
(
72 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (214/149) | Win/Loss | 51% (468/441) |
| 59% (492/339) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (1100/1065) |
| 54% (4173/3572) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (10361/10357) |
| 54% (21/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (43/58) |
| 60% (192/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (418/370) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 637 | Aces Total | 1707 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 635 | Total Double Faults | 3058 |
| 1:39:19 | Average Match Time | 1:25:59 |
| 387.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 522.36 |
| 66% (14396/21771) | 1st Serve % | 61% (33228/54155) |
| 66% (9532/14396) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (21901/33228) |
| 52% (3800/7375) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9922/20927) |
| 45% (1036/2328) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2292/5476) |
| 42% (9167/21931) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21620/53650) |
| 20% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 35% (15/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (5/4) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (57/57) |
| 52% (101/94) | Challenger W/L | 50% (277/282) |
| 70% (105/46) | Futures W/L | 64% (110/63) |
| 60% (211/353) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (462/889) |
| 17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (3/15) |
| 50% (55/109) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (165/302) |
| 41% (42/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (178/335) |
| 83% (230/190) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (463/378) |
| 17% (230/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (463/85) |
| 18% (133/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (445/90) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
