M. P. D. Almeida
To Win
F. Mena
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L L W W LForm
W L L W W W L W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Almeida winning 1 and Dias winning 2. The last match between Almeida and Dias was at the M25 Punta del Este, 15-02-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Pedro Boscardin Dias getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
M25 Punta del Este(15-02-2025)
17 Mar 2025 / First
17 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Insights on the upcoming tennis match:
In terms of second serve performance in recent form, Almeida has displayed exceptional skill, winning 52.65% of points on their second serve, surpassing Dias who has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 50.52%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
When examining return game stats in recent form, Almeida has proven to be a formidable opponent, winning an impressive 54.02% of their opponent's second serve points. Dias, on the other hand, has shown remarkable prowess by securing victory in 53.48% of similar scenarios. First serve return statistics further illustrate their abilities, with Almeida holding a 37.37% success rate and Dias slightly edging ahead at 37.56%. These figures play a significant role in determining the favorite in this head-to-head matchup.
An insightful analysis of performances under pressure reveals Almeida's ability to save 56.32% of breakpoints in recent form, while Dias has demonstrated a slightly higher success rate of 59.26%. This statistic proves to be instrumental in making in-game betting predictions.
A comprehensive performance overview of the past year showcases Almeida's overall success, with a 58.06% win rate (36 wins and 26 losses). Conversely, Dias boasts a 51.56% win rate (33 wins and 31 losses), providing us with an overview of the predicted head-to-head outcome.
When examining their performances on different surfaces, we find that Almeida excels on clay, achieving an impressive win rate of 60% (184 wins and 121 losses), while their performance on indoor hard courts is considerably weaker, with a win rate of 0% (0 wins and 1 loss). Dias, on the other hand, achieves their best career win rate on clay, standing at 53% (109 wins and 97 losses), while their performance on hard courts is slightly lower, with a win rate of 40% (8 wins and 12 losses).
In terms of player level and the tournaments they have participated in, Almeida predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000, attaining a 53.19% win rate (25 wins and 22 losses). Dias, on the other hand, has primarily participated in similar Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving a win rate of 38.24% (13 wins and 21 losses). In predicting the favorite, one must consider the relative event level in which the players have been competing.
Exploring opponent quality stats, over the past 12 months Almeida has faced opponents with an average rank of 326.35, demonstrating their ability to compete against formidable opponents. Conversely, Dias has faced players with an average rank of 454.44.
In the event that this match extends to a deciding set, Almeida has a success rate of 32% in winning such matches over the past year. On the other hand, Dias has displayed an even greater prowess in decisive moments, winning 43% of all matches played on tour.
While analyzing past player performances proves to be highly valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics for an indication of the players' current form. The section below should be consulted to assess the players' performances in the current event. Furthermore, players may exhibit enhanced proficiency at specific events, which must also be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
Another crucial factor in live betting is break point conversion. In recent form, Almeida has capitalized on 49% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Dias has exhibited a conversion rate of 44.57% when given the chance to break their opponents' serves. These statistics provide valuable insights for in-game live betting tips.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it should be noted that its content is geared towards statistics enthusiasts.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
73 of
127)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jose Pereira
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Valerio Aboian
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
47
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Hernan Casanova
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
86%
(
44 of
51)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Rocco Valente
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Rubber 4 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Ignacio Monzon
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Wilson Leite
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Coria
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Andrea Collarini
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Valentin Basel
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
42
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
60%
(
71 of
119)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
34%
(
40 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
113)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Almeida