Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W L L
Form
W W W W L W L W L LHead To Head: Almeida 0 - 0 Ambrogi
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gormaz VS Juvan PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Goffin PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 18 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:9:33 | Average Match Time | 2:9:33 |
| 72% (97/135) | 1st Serve % | 67% (121/180) |
| 70% (68/97) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (65/121) |
| 45% (17/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (29/59) |
| 32% (10/31) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 48% (86/180) | Return Points Win % | 37% (50/135) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Almeida vs Ambrogi Match Preview :
- Recently, Almeida has shown slightly better second serve points win rate at 44.78% compared to Ambrogi's 44.03%.
- Looking at return game statistics, Almeida edges Ambrogi by winning 49.05% of second serve return points versus 45.53%, favoring Almeida in match predictions.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Ambrogi outperforms Almeida, capturing 32.67% of points compared to Almeida's 29.61%.
- Under pressure, Ambrogi has a marginally better breakpoint save percentage at 52.52%, compared to Almeida's 49.4%.
- Over the last year, Ambrogi has a higher win percentage at 63.22% compared to Almeida's 60.56%.
- Both players excel on clay surfaces, with Ambrogi having a slight edge with a 62% win record compared to Almeida's 61%.
- In the Challenger/ITF tournaments, Almeida has a slight edge in win rates, 58.18% compared to Ambrogi's 57.89%, but the difference remains negligible.
- Their direct match history favors Almeida, who has won the sole encounter against Ambrogi in straight sets on clay.
- Against tougher opponents, Almeida faces stiffer competition with an average opponent rank of 339.62 versus Ambrogi's 368.75.
- In deciding sets against all players, Ambrogi has a higher win percentage at 54% compared to Almeida's 41%.
- While Almeida shows slightly lower breakpoint conversion rates at 31.61% compared to Ambrogi's 33.97%, this statistic can be crucial during live betting.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Almeida and Ambrogi looks highly competitive, with both players having their strengths and weaknesses.
Almeida may have a slight edge initially due to previous head-to-head victory and better second serve return performance, which often correlates with match success.
However, Ambrogi's higher breakpoint conversion rate and better performance under pressure situations might give him an advantage in crucial match moments.
Considering the surface is clay, where both excel, player past records slightly lean towards Ambrogi when the match reaches deciding moments.
Overall, considering the consistent aspects and recent form of both players, Almeida might be the most likely victor in this tightly contested match.
Almeida vs Ambrogi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Stefan Palosi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Gonzalo Villanueva
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Peter Bertran
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
45%
(
40 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
105)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
65%
(
31 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Barrena
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
90 of
135)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
64 of
135)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Thiago Cigarran
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Aryan Shah
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Enzo Kohlmann De Freitas
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Almeida vs. Ambrogi Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
