Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
L L L W W W W W W LH2H: Almeida 3 - 1 Meza
They have played 9 sets in total, with Almeida winning 6 and Meza winning 3. The last match between Almeida and Meza was at the Santos Challenger, 11-05-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Clay, with Alvaro Guillen Meza getting the victory 6-3 7-6(12).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | 3 |
| Alvaro Guillen Meza | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Santos Challenger(11-05-2025)
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
6
3
7
6
| Almeida | Stats | Meza |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (17-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (22-12) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 276 | Ranking | 180 |
| 190 | Highest Rank | 180 |
| 24 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 7 |
| 60% (222-151) | Career Total W/L | 59% (154-106) |
| $57,890 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Brancaccio VS Erjavec PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(12) |
Stats 
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-0 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 48 | Games Won | 32 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:44:37 | Average Match Time | 1:44:37 |
| 68% (178/262) | 1st Serve % | 73% (185/255) |
| 75% (133/178) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (118/185) |
| 55% (46/84) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (29/70) |
| 46% (12/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (4/20) |
| 42% (108/255) | Return Points Win % | 32% (83/262) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Almeida vs Meza Match Preview :
- Second Serve: Meza has a second serve point win rate of 40.85%, slightly lower than Almeida's 43.43%. Could this be a pivotal factor?
- Return Game: Meza wins 46.5% of points on opponents' second serve; Almeida edges out with 48.09%. On first serves, Meza is stronger at 34.82% compared to Almeida's 29.86%.
- Under Pressure: Meza saves 51.4% of breakpoints, narrowly outperforming Almeida's 48.41%. Is this a sign of greater composure during critical moments?
- Performance Overview: Over the last year, Meza has a match win percentage of 59.72%, slightly less than Almeida's 61.64%.
- Best Surface: Both players excel on clay with a 61% win rate, but neither has won on indoor hard courts (I.hard).
- Event Participation: Meza has won 56.9% of matches in ITF and Challenger circuits, while Almeida has a higher win rate of 59.65% in similar events. What impact does this have on determining the favorite?
- Direct Head-to-Head: Almeida has defeated Meza in all three of their past encounters, winning 6 of 7 sets.
- Average Match Duration: Their matches average at 1:41:43, suggesting tightly contested games.
- Extreme Pressure: No tiebreaks played in past matchups. How might this influence the outcome in a closely fought set?
- Opponent Quality: Meza has faced opponents ranked on average at 315.5, whereas Almeida's opponents average a rank of 325.74.
- Deciding Set Performance: Meza wins 46% of deciding sets; Almeida trails with 39%. Is Meza more resilient in critical deciding moments?
- Breakpoint Conversion: Meza converts 36.84% of breakpoints, outperforming Almeida who converts 31.41%. What edge does this give Meza in high-stakes scenarios?
Editorial Prediction (May 11, 2025, UTC):
Both players show strong performance on clay, an essential aspect for this upcoming match. However, Almeida's past victories over Meza in all three encounters provide a strong psychological advantage. Additionally, the combination of a slightly higher second serve performance and returning ability gives Almeida the upper hand.
Meza's resilience in break point and deciding set situations demonstrates significant strengths under pressure, yet Almeida's consistent match record and head-to-head success may indicate a capacity to outlast Meza over a full match.
Considering all the statistical aspects, Almeida appears to have a marginally higher likelihood to secure the win in this contest, although Meza's ability to handle pressure should not be underestimated.
Almeida vs Meza Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Nicolas Kicker
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Lautaro Midon
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
6
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Eduardo Ribeiro
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Lautaro Midon
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Conner Huertas Del Pino
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Alvaro Guillen Meza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
81%
(
73 of
90)
1st Serve %
81%
(
59 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Franco Roncadelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Renzo Olivo
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
83%
(
73 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
52%
(
46 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Zdenek Kolar
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
29 of
68)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
49%
(
27 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (222/151) | Win/Loss | 59% (154/106) |
| 60% (509/346) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (350/249) |
| 54% (4307/3659) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2968/2559) |
| 54% (21/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) |
| 61% (200/130) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (150/96) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 661 | Aces Total | 234 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 676 | Total Double Faults | 799 |
| 1:39:57 | Average Match Time | 1:42:45 |
| 387.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 362.1 |
| 66% (14883/22546) | 1st Serve % | 70% (11177/15856) |
| 66% (9868/14883) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (7033/11177) |
| 51% (3942/7663) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2247/4679) |
| 45% (1078/2417) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (914/1958) |
| 42% (9508/22681) | Return Points Win % | 44% (7156/16116) |
| 20% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 56% (5/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (109/96) | Challenger W/L | 52% (54/50) |
| 70% (105/46) | Futures W/L | 66% (98/51) |
| 60% (219/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (152/257) |
| 17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (57/113) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (34/66) |
| 42% (45/107) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (37/80) |
| 83% (237/197) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (161/136) |
| 16% (237/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (161/25) |
| 18% (136/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (99/18) |
Almeida vs. Meza Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
