Matea Mamic vs Gaia Squarcialupi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mamic vs Squarcialupi analysis and find out who is favored!
Matea Mamic vs Gaia Squarcialupi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mamic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Squarcialupi has won 45.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mamic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Squarcialupi has won 60.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mamic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Squarcialupi has saved 57.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mamic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Squarcialupi winning 55.26% (W/L 21/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mamic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 16/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 16/ 30). Squarcialupi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 87), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 26% (W/L 9/ 26).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mamic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mamic winning 2 and Squarcialupi winning 0. The last match between Mamic and Squarcialupi was at the Maribor, 09-06-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Matea Mamic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mamic and Squarcialupi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mamic winning 0 times and Squarcialupi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mamic winning 0, and Squarcialupi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mamic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Squarcialupi has played against players with an average rank of 138.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mamic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Squarcialupi has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mamic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Squarcialupi has converted 57.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mamic 1 - 0 Squarcialupi
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
835
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
35% (16-30)
Career Total W/L
44% (89-114)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mamic VS Squarcialupi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Matea Mamic | Gaia Squarcialupi |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (33/53) | 56% (32/57) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (25/33) | 63% (20/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 40% (10/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 17% (1/6) |
Return Points W% | 47% (27/57) | 32% (17/53) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mamic VS Squarcialupi H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Matea Mamic
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matea Mamic | Gaia Squarcialupi |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (76/75) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
Aces Total | 0 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 0 | 18 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 199.57 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (239/386) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (137/239) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (58/147) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 57% (27/47) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (184/374) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 60% (5/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (5/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Matea Mamic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Maryna Chernyshova
Player
Matea Mamic
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 2-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Chantal Skamlova
Player
Matea Mamic
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Gaia Squarcialupi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 3-6 7-6(4) 11-9 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Gina Feistel
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Hao Liang
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Margherita Marcon
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
116
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
48%
(
15 of
31)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Divine Dasam Nweke
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
15
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more