Prediction of Masamichi Imamura [342nd] vs Zhengyu Sun [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W L L L
Form
L L L W L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Imamura 1 - 0 Sun
They have played 3 sets in total, with Imamura winning 2 and Sun winning 1. The last match between Imamura and Sun was at the M25 Luan, 12-03-2025, First, Hard with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 2-6 6-0 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Masamichi Imamura | 1 |
| Zhengyu Sun | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhengyu Sun
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:44:34 | Average Match Time | 1:44:34 |
| 71% (54/76) | 1st Serve % | 50% (33/66) |
| 50% (27/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (17/33) |
| 68% (15/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (14/33) |
| 88% (7/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 53% (35/66) | Return Points Win % | 45% (34/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Masamichi Imamura vs Zhengyu Sun Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Imamura 1 - 0 Sun
Editorial Prediction:
When assessing the recent performance of both players, Imamura has shown a stronger capability on second serve, having won 47.64% of points compared to Sun's 38.46% over the last six months. This second serve performance significantly correlates with match prediction accuracy.
Looking at return game statistics, Imamura has dominated by winning 43.65% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Sun has a lower effectiveness, winning none at 0%. For first serve returns, Sun has an edge with a win rate of 30.77% compared to Imamura’s 26.64%. Yet, when predicting the favored player for their head-to-head matchup, these numbers play a crucial role.
Under pressure, Sun displays a strong breakpoint-saving ability with a 71.43% success rate, outperforming Imamura's 58.05%. Such a statistic is vital for in-game betting predictions, signaling Sun's resilience under pressure. Overall, during the past year, Imamura has been more successful, winning 63.86% of matches (W/L 53/30), while Sun has achieved a 36.84% win rate (W/L 7/12).
On favorable surfaces, both players perform best on indoor hard courts. Imamura holds a win rate of 67% (W/L 6/3) on this surface, whereas Sun records a 50% winning percentage (W/L 1/1). Conversely, Imamura struggles on clay with a 50% win rate, while Sun’s weakness appears on hard courts with just a 35% win rate (W/L 9/17).
Analyzing the level at which each player competes, Imamura consistently plays in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.69% of those matches (W/L 41/17), while Sun also predominantly competes at this level but with a lower success rate of 36.84% (W/L 7/12). The level of competition they face is pivotal in determining their relative standings.
Regarding opponent quality, Imamura’s opponents have had an average rank of 434.95, reflecting a slightly less challenging slate, compared to Sun's tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 150.79. In terms of deciding sets, Imamura has managed a 52% success rate in the last 12 months, eclipsing Sun's 33% from all tour matches.
Break point conversion remains a telling statistic. Imamura has been able to convert 36.92% of breakpoint chances, whereas Sun has been unable to capitalize on similar opportunities, recording a 0% conversion rate. Understanding these dynamics can offer insights for live betting or match outcome predictions.
Considering each facet of their performance, Imamura appears to have an advantage across the board. Given these comprehensive statistics, Imamura is more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming match against Sun.
Masamichi Imamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Masamichi Imamura
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
0-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shunsuke Nakagawa
Player
Masamichi Imamura
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Masamichi Imamura
47%
(
44 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tianhui Zhang
Player
Masamichi Imamura
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhengyu Sun
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Masamichi Imamura
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Blake Ellis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zhengyu Sun Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Zhengyu Sun
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhengyu Sun
Player
Minghui Zhang
41%
(
35 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhengyu Sun
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 4-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-7(5) 10-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (150/102) | Win/Loss | 33% (11/22) |
| 59% (331/234) | Sets Win/Loss | 37% (26/45) |
| 54% (2848/2438) | Games Win/Loss | 43% (273/361) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 363 | Aces Total | 19 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 256 | Total Double Faults | 24 |
| 1:7:52 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 446.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 183.09 |
| 66% (7654/11615) | 1st Serve % | 50% (262/522) |
| 66% (5019/7654) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (171/262) |
| 50% (1971/3961) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (121/260) |
| 45% (576/1277) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (17/44) |
| 42% (4991/11953) | Return Points Win % | 38% (180/480) |
| 60% (149/250) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (10/30) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (28/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (30/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 90% (151/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (9/8) |
| 10% (151/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (9/1) |
| 14% (101/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (24/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
