Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Masamichi Imamura vs Samir Banerjee Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Imamura vs Banerjee analysis and find out who is favored!
Masamichi Imamura vs Samir Banerjee Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Imamura has won 50.97% of points on his second serve, while Banerjee has won 47.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Imamura, in recent form, has won 56.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Banerjee has won 56.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.75% and 39.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Imamura has saved 59.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Banerjee has saved 56.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Imamura has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 23/ 13), with Banerjee winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Imamura has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 102/ 67), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Banerjee has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 15/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Imamura has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.97% of matches (W/L 20/ 9), where as Banerjee has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Imamura has played against opponents with an average rank of 176.69 while Banerjee has played against players with an average rank of 136.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Imamura has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Banerjee has won 17% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Imamura has converted 50.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Banerjee has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Imamura 0 - 0 Banerjee
841
Rank
596
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
832
Rank
829
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
60% (106-72)
Career Total W/L
50% (23-23)
67% (20-10)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Masamichi Imamura | Samir Banerjee |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (20/10) | 50% (2/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (44/24) | 63% (5/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (374/283) | 53% (39/34) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (20/10) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 45 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:20 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.33 | 201.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1121/1593) | 58% (149/256) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (740/1121) | 70% (104/149) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (248/472) | 45% (48/107) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (90/176) | 34% (11/32) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (734/1643) | 42% (103/248) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (17/8) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (20/30) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 0% (2/0) |
Masamichi Imamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Matthew Summers
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-7(7) 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Joe Tyler
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
2
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Sora Fukuda
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Jake Delaney
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Leo Vithoontien
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Samir Banerjee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Samir Banerjee
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Pablo Masjuan Ginel
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Samir Banerjee
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Samir Banerjee
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ozan Baris
Player
Samir Banerjee
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
William Grant
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Alafia Ayeni
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Alex Bancila
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Imamura Vs Banerjee Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
