Prediction of Masamichi Imamura [342nd] vs Kasidit Samrej [406th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W L L L
Form
L L W W L W W W L LH2H: Imamura 2 - 0 Samrej
They have played 5 sets in total, with Imamura winning 4 and Samrej winning 1. The last match between Imamura and Samrej was at the Pune Challenger, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Masamichi Imamura | 2 |
| Kasidit Samrej | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 22 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:1:21 | Average Match Time | 2:1:21 |
| 63% (100/159) | 1st Serve % | 57% (98/172) |
| 70% (70/100) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (70/98) |
| 58% (34/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (36/74) |
| 32% (6/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 38% (66/172) | Return Points Win % | 35% (55/159) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Masamichi Imamura vs Kasidit Samrej Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Imamura 2 - 0 Samrej
Editorial Prediction:
- Prediction based on recent second serve performance: In the past six months, Imamura has demonstrated an impressive success rate of 53.69% when it comes to winning points on their second serve. On the other hand, Samrej has achieved a slightly lower but still commendable rate of 49.62%. It is worth highlighting the significant correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match prediction.
- Insights on return game statistics: Analyzing the recent form of Imamura, their proficiency in winning 50.91% of their opponent's second serve points is evident. However, Samrej has showcased an even higher level of skill, triumphing in 52.65% of such points. Comparatively, when it comes to first serve returns, Imamura has recorded a rate of 31.9%, with Samrej not far behind at 31.95%. The insights derived from these statistics hold a strong correlation with identifying the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
- Examining performance under pressure: Delving into the realm of pressure situations, Imamura has proven to be a resilient force, successfully saving 61.42% of breakpoints in recent matches. Similarly, Samrej has exhibited a remarkable ability to save breakpoints, with a saving rate of 61.49%. This particular aspect of their game serves as a valuable statistic in the realm of in-game betting predictions.
- Comprehensive performance overview: Over the past year, Imamura has shown their prowess by triumphing in 63.53% of matches played, boasting an impressive win-loss record of 54/31. On the other hand, Samrej has exhibited an even higher winning percentage of 64.41% (W/L 38/21). These statistics provide us with a holistic prediction overview for their head-to-head encounter.
- Unveiling the impact of different court surfaces: With regards to their career performance on varied surfaces, Imamura excels on hard courts, securing an impressive win rate of 67% (W/L 6/3). Conversely, their performance on clay is relatively weaker, with a win rate of 50% (W/L 6/6). In Samrej's case, their optimal performance is observed on hard courts, registering a win rate of 55% (W/L 104/86), while their proficiency on clay declines significantly, with a win rate of 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level and tournament analysis: During the past year, Imamura has predominantly participated in tournaments such as Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments worth $10K, securing victory in an impressive 70.31% of matches (W/L 45/19). Likewise, Samrej has predominantly showcased their skills in similar tournaments, winning 70.73% of matches (W/L 29/12). It is important to note that when assessing players' statistics to predict the favorite, it remains crucial to consider the relative event level in which they have competed.
- Past head-to-head encounters: Imamura and Samrej have crossed paths on one previous occasion, with Imamura emerging triumphant on that single occasion while Samrej has yet to secure a victory. In terms of sets played, Imamura has won two sets, while Samrej hasn't claimed a set against Imamura. The most recent clash between these two took place at the M25 Tay Ninh on September 28, 2022. The match was played on hard court, with Masamichi Imamura prevailing with a scoreline of 6-3, 6-3.
- Average match duration in head-to-head matches: Historically, the average match duration between Imamura and Samrej stands at 1 hour, 32 minutes, and 0 seconds.
- Predicting the outcome of a deciding set: In their previous encounters, Imamura and Samrej have never faced a deciding set. In potential future scenarios where a match extends to a deciding set, it is crucial to note that Imamura has no prior victories in such situations, while Samrej also lacks a notable winning record. This information serves as a valuable asset in predicting the potential outcome should this match require a deciding set.
- Close encounters and tiebreaks: Notably, Imamura and Samrej have never faced each other in tiebreak situations, meaning there is no recorded data on how they perform in such intense moments.
- Assessing opponent quality: Over the past 12 months, Imamura has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 432.87. Comparatively, Samrej has faced opponents with a marginally higher average ranking of 416.32.
- Deciding set performance against all players: If one wishes to engage in live predictions and betting, it is crucial to acknowledge that Imamura has a favorable track record in deciding sets over the past 12 months, having emerged victorious in 52% of these situations. Meanwhile, Samrej's performance in deciding sets has yielded a slightly lower success rate of 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance serves as a valuable indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to closely examine the players' performance at the ongoing event. For real-time assessments of in-form players, readers are encouraged to refer to the section below (event statistics) if the players have already competed in the current event. Additionally, certain players tend to excel in specific events, and this factor ought to be taken into account when making predictions.
- Break point conversion rates: Recent statistics reveal that Imamura has successfully converted 40.8% of breakpoint opportunities, demonstrating their ability to seize crucial moments in the game. In comparison, Samrej has showcased a slightly lower conversion rate of 37.2% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics are particularly telling when it comes to in-game live betting tips, as they shed light on how each player capitalizes on breakpoint opportunities.
- If you are interested in exploring models that offer predictions for tennis matches, you may find this article to be a valuable resource. (Disclaimer: Recommended for statistics enthusiasts only)
Masamichi Imamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Masamichi Imamura
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
0-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shunsuke Nakagawa
Player
Masamichi Imamura
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Masamichi Imamura
47%
(
44 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tianhui Zhang
Player
Masamichi Imamura
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhengyu Sun
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Masamichi Imamura
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Blake Ellis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kasidit Samrej Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Kasidit Samrej
57%
(
70 of
122)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
127)
17
Aces
5
10
Double Faults
7
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
62 of
86)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
43 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
127)
127
Total Points Won
122
|
6-4 6-7(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Kasidit Samrej
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Alexandr Binda
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Erik Grevelius
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kasidit Samrej
42%
(
15 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
46%
(
42 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
7
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
49%
(
41 of
83)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
3
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Kasidit Samrej
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
91 of
155)
24
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
6
91%
(
53 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
59 of
91)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
22%
(
23 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
67 of
155)
148
Total Points Won
111
|
6-2 4-6 3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (150/102) | Win/Loss | 55% (114/95) |
| 59% (331/234) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (264/204) |
| 54% (2848/2438) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2293/2105) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 363 | Aces Total | 1144 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 256 | Total Double Faults | 722 |
| 1:7:52 | Average Match Time | 1:28:34 |
| 446.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.37 |
| 66% (7654/11615) | 1st Serve % | 62% (7596/12340) |
| 66% (5019/7654) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (5482/7596) |
| 50% (1971/3961) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2339/4744) |
| 45% (576/1277) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (458/1132) |
| 42% (4991/11953) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4591/11981) |
| 60% (149/250) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (109/196) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 52% (28/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (31/58) |
| 49% (30/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 31% (17/54) |
| 90% (151/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (121/102) |
| 10% (151/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (121/19) |
| 14% (101/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (88/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
