Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maryna Zanevska vs Margot Yerolymos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zanevska vs Yerolymos analysis and find out who is favored!
Maryna Zanevska vs Margot Yerolymos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zanevska has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Yerolymos has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zanevska, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Yerolymos has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zanevska has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yerolymos has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zanevska has won 25% of matches played (W/L 3/ 9), with Yerolymos winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zanevska has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 119/ 57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 10/ 19). Yerolymos has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 39/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 49/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Zanevska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2), where as Yerolymos has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zanevska has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.42 while Yerolymos has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zanevska has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yerolymos has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zanevska has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yerolymos has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zanevska 0 - 0 Yerolymos
498
Rank
62
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
858
Rank
306
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
61% (436-273)
Career Total W/L
57% (246-183)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$707,986
Career Prize Money
$22,359
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maryna Zanevska | Margot Yerolymos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Maryna Zanevska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Maryna Zanevska
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
9
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Maryna Zanevska
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Maryna Zanevska
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Maryna Zanevska
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maryna Zanevska
Player
Lena Papadakis
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Maryna Zanevska
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Maryna Zanevska
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Maryna Zanevska
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Maryna Zanevska
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maryna Zanevska
Player
Laura Pigossi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Margot Yerolymos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Margot Yerolymos
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
110)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mallaurie Noel
Player
Margot Yerolymos
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Amira Ben Aissa
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Margot Yerolymos
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Veronika Podrez
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Margot Yerolymos
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zanevska Vs Yerolymos Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
