Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marvin Moeller vs Deney Wassermann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Moeller vs Wassermann analysis and find out who is favored!
Marvin Moeller vs Deney Wassermann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Moeller has won 52.83% of points on his second serve, while Wassermann has won 51.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Moeller, in recent form, has won 52.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wassermann has won 49.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33% and 33.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Moeller has saved 61.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wassermann has saved 62.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Moeller has won 68.35% of matches played (W/L 54/ 25), with Wassermann winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Moeller has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 60/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9). Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 68/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Moeller has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 79.07% of matches (W/L 34/ 9), where as Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Moeller winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Moeller winning 2 and Wassermann winning 1. The last match between Moeller and Wassermann was at the M25 Alkmaar, 24-06-2021, Second, Clay with Marvin Moeller getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Moeller and Wassermann have played a deciding set 1 times, with Moeller winning 1 times and Wassermann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Moeller winning 1, and Wassermann 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Moeller has played against opponents with an average rank of 247.33 while Wassermann has played against players with an average rank of 180.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Moeller has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wassermann has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Moeller has converted 39.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wassermann has converted 32.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Moeller 1 - 0 Wassermann
310
Rank
296
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
715
Rank
696
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
62% (167-101)
Career Total W/L
59% (99-70)
50% (6-6)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Moeller VS Wassermann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Marvin Moeller | Deney Wassermann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:5:0 | 3:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (62/112) | 60% (72/121) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (34/62) | 64% (46/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (32/50) | 31% (15/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 67% (6/9) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (60/121) | 41% (46/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Moeller VS Wassermann H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-7(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Marvin Moeller
Player
Deney Wassermann
55%
(
62 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
121)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
8
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
46 of
72)
64%
(
32 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marvin Moeller | Deney Wassermann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (6/6) | 50% (6/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (15/13) | 52% (13/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (140/139) | 52% (117/106) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 32 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:41 | 1:37:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 358.5 | 133.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (583/880) | 54% (389/721) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (389/583) | 73% (285/389) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (145/297) | 52% (173/332) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (37/93) | 28% (25/88) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (366/912) | 39% (296/762) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (6/12) | 67% (6/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 25% (8/2) |
Marvin Moeller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Marvin Moeller
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Marvin Moeller
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
25 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
1-6 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Marvin Moeller
72%
(
73 of
101)
1st Serve %
77%
(
86 of
111)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
86)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Filip Krajinovic
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
David Poljak
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Marvin Moeller
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Tibo Colson
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Marvin Moeller
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Deney Wassermann
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Deney Wassermann
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Deney Wassermann
78%
(
77 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
76%
(
26 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
95)
6
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Moeller Vs Wassermann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
