Martyna Kubka vs Emma Wilson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W W W L
Form
W L L W W L W L W LHead-to-head: Kubka 0 - 1 Wilson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kubka winning 0 and Wilson winning 2. The last match between Kubka and Wilson was at the W35 Manchester, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Emma Wilson getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-6(7).
W35 Manchester(16-02-2025)
7
6
7
6
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rakhimova VS Blinkova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Yuan VS Siniakova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | |||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
12
Games Won
14
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martyna Kubka vs Emma Wilson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martyna Kubka 0 - 1 Emma Wilson
Predicting the Outcome of an Upcoming Tennis Match: Insights and Analysis
One crucial factor that significantly impacts match prediction accuracy is the second serve performance in recent form. Over the last six months, Kubka has demonstrated a commendable record, winning an impressive 44.29% of points on their second serve. On the other hand, Wilson has exhibited a slightly lower success rate, clinching 42.33% of these points. This statistic showcases a noteworthy correlation between second serve performance and the accuracy of match predictions.
Moreover, when considering recent return game stats, Kubka's dominance becomes apparent. They have triumphed in 58.19% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Wilson has achieved a respectable 52.22% success rate in recent form. Evaluating first serve returns, Kubka has attained a solid rate of 36.34%, while Wilson has managed to secure 33.07%. These statistics have a substantial correlation with predicting the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
An in-depth analysis of how players handle pressure situations unveils vital insights for in-game betting predictions. Kubka has successfully saved 57.21% of breakpoints, further boosting their odds for victory. Wilson, not far behind, has impressively saved 60.74% of breakpoints. This compelling statistic offers valuable information for bettors looking to make informed predictions during the match.
Examining the players' overall performance over the past year, Kubka has emerged victorious in 49.06% of their matches (W/L: 26/27). On the other hand, Wilson boasts an even better record, winning 55.17% of their matches (W/L: 16/13). Taking these figures into account allows us to develop a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Considering the players' preferred surfaces, Kubka has thrived on hard courts, showcasing an impressive 62% career win rate (W/L: 73/45). In contrast, clay surfaces pose a challenge for Kubka, resulting in a relatively lower win rate of 45% (W/L: 29/35). As for Wilson, hard courts also prove favorable, with a notable career win rate of 57% (W/L: 39/29). However, grass surfaces present a real struggle for Wilson, holding a discouraging 0% win rate (W/L: 0/2).
An essential factor to consider when assessing player performance is the level of competition they have faced. In the past year, Kubka has primarily competed in the Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, securing victories in 51.02% of their matches (W/L: 25/24). On the other hand, Wilson has flourished in similar tournaments, winning 55.56% of their matches (W/L: 15/12). It is crucial to recognize that when comparing players' statistics to predict the favorite, these figures bear relevance to the level of events they have participated in.
Examining opponent quality stats over the previous twelve months, Kubka has encountered opponents with an average rank of 380.47. Comparatively, Wilson has faced players with an average rank of 328.83. These figures provide valuable context for understanding the challenges each player has encountered and their ability to overcome formidable opponents.
In live predictions and betting scenarios, the performance of players in deciding sets is of particular interest. Kubka has exhibited impressive resilience in these situations, triumphing in 53% of deciding sets during the past twelve months. Wilson, not to be outdone, has displayed an even higher success rate, winning 58% of deciding sets across all matches played on tour. These statistics serve as essential indicators for astute bettors.
While past player performance proves invaluable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to assess current event stats for insights into the form of each player. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the section below for players' performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, noteworthy disparities may exist in players' performances across various events, reinforcing the necessity of considering such factors when making informed outcome predictions.
An indicator of players' effectiveness in seizing crucial opportunities lies in their break point conversion rate. In recent form, Kubka has impressively converted 42.79% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Wilson has achieved an even higher rate, converting 50.51% of such chances to break their opponents' serve. This notable statistic warrants careful consideration for those seeking insights for in-game live betting tips.
Finally, for those enthusiastic about models that predict tennis matches, this informative article offers an excellent starting point. (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Martyna Kubka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Amandine Monnot
Player
Martyna Kubka
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Veronika Podrez
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Teodora Kostovic
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
7 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
42
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Unknown Player
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Holly Hutchinson
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
47%
(
9 of
19)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
24
Total Points Won
11
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Martyna Kubka
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
8
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
9
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anastasia Gasanova
Player
Martyna Kubka
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
3
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emma Wilson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Amy Zhu
Player
Emma Wilson
82%
(
73 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(7) 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Gillan
Player
Emma Wilson
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Wilson
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Adams
Player
Emma Wilson
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Wilson
Player
Holly Hutchinson
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 5-7 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Wilson
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Emma Wilson
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
82 of
132)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
53 of
82)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
60 of
132)
118
Total Points Won
101
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tegan Bush
Player
Emma Wilson
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
56% (146/114)
Win/Loss
52% (62/58)
55% (332/269)
Sets Win/Loss
51% (143/138)
52% (2963/2701)
Games Win/Loss
51% (1390/1347)
62% (73/45)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (39/29)
45% (29/35)
Clay Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
56% (44/34)
Indoor Hard W/L
46% (23/27)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/2)
0.33
Aces Per Game
0.2
909
Aces Total
273
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.28
736
Total Double Faults
373
1:35:23
Average Match Time
1:25:30
447.33
Average Opponent Rank
193.1
65% (10658/16457)
1st Serve %
65% (4821/7448)
64% (6870/10658)
1st Serve Win %
64% (3104/4821)
48% (2758/5799)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (1174/2627)
46% (845/1825)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (352/747)
43% (7017/16207)
Return Points Win %
42% (3091/7348)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
14% (1/6)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
53% (95/83)
Challenger W/L
52% (54/50)
67% (50/25)
Futures W/L
50% (8/8)
56% (143/255)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
51% (61/119)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
51% (34/67)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (14/27)
50% (43/86)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (22/42)
83% (149/123)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (61/52)
17% (149/25)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (61/9)
21% (111/23)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (59/10)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
