Marton Fucsovics vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W L
Form
L L W W W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Fucsovics 1 - 0 Zahraj
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fucsovics winning 2 and Zahraj winning 1. The last match between Fucsovics and Zahraj was at the Boss Open - Stuttgart, 07-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Marton Fucsovics getting the victory 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marton Fucsovics | 1 |
| Patrick Zahraj | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Boss Open - Stuttgart(07-06-2025)
Marton Fucsovics
Patrick Zahraj
6
4
6
7
7
5
| Fucsovics | Stats | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (31-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (27-23) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 89 | Ranking | 283 |
| 31 | Highest Rank | 272 |
| 33 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (492-363) | Career Total W/L | 57% (139-105) |
| $4,794,929 | Career Prize Money | $6,850 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Buzarnescu VS Ryser PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Buse PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5 |
Stats 
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
52 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
63 of
123)
8
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
8
88%
(
46 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
123)
120
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 16 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:42:36 | Average Match Time | 2:42:36 |
| 55% (52/95) | 1st Serve % | 51% (63/123) |
| 88% (46/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (47/63) |
| 49% (21/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (23/60) |
| 29% (5/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 43% (53/123) | Return Points Win % | 29% (28/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fucsovics vs Zahraj Match Preview :
- Second serve performance in the last 6 months shows Fucsovics winning 39.38% of points, whereas Zahraj is at 0%. What does this tell us? It indicates Fucsovics’ superior second serve success may give them an edge.
- Fucsovics has dominated in returning, claiming 49.08% of opponent's second serves and 27.04% of first serves, both far surpassing Zahraj’s 0% in these categories.
- Under pressure, Fucsovics has effectively saved 57% of breakpoints, compared to Zahraj’s 0%, suggesting a robust resistance against game pressure situations.
- Over the past year, Fucsovics has won 42.86% of his matches (9/12), while Zahraj has not secured any wins, clearly favoring Fucsovics in terms of recent match outcomes.
- Fucsovics favors clay surfaces with a 54% win rate, presenting potential strength on clay courts, whereas Zahraj’s statistics on surfaces are not available for comparison.
- In match-level consideration, Fucsovics has mainly competed on the Main tour with a 42.86% win rate, contrasting Zahraj’s absence from match participation and results, marking Fucsovics as the more experienced contender.
- Fucsovics has battled opponents averaging a rank of 72 over the past year, indicating frequent competition with high-caliber players.
- Intriguingly, Fucsovics has won 33% of deciding sets, something to note for matches extending to a decider, while Zahraj remains winless in such scenarios.
- Fucsovics’ breakpoint conversion stands at 33.33%, maybe affecting pivotal moments where Zahraj has again seen no success, implying potential for key-game turnarounds.
Editorial Prediction (June 7, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the head-to-head statistics, a clear picture emerges favoring Fucsovics for the upcoming match. The second serve statistics strongly indicate Fucsovics’ advantage in winning crucial points.
The return game figures additionally underline Fucsovics' superiority, given his effective return against both first and second serves, which Zahraj hasn’t matched recently.
Considering performance under pressure, the significant difference in breakpoint conversion rates further tips the scales toward Fucsovics.
Fucsovics’ experience against tougher opponents and success in match play compare to Zahraj's lack of participation, suggesting he's likely better-prepared for various match situations.
Given these factors, Fucsovics is likely to emerge victorious in this prospective contest.
Fucsovics vs Zahraj Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Marton Fucsovics Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Marton Fucsovics
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
25 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Gael Monfils
62%
(
109 of
175)
1st Serve %
63%
(
102 of
161)
1
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
3
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
68 of
102)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
75 of
175)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
65 of
161)
165
Total Points Won
171
|
6-4 1-6 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
63%
(
101 of
161)
1st Serve %
58%
(
85 of
146)
18
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
84 of
101)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
64 of
85)
53%
(
32 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
28%
(
45 of
161)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
51 of
146)
167
Total Points Won
140
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Marton Fucsovics
74%
(
90 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
115)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
119
|
6-3 6-4 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Zachary Svajda
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Jurij Rodionov
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Marton Fucsovics
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Patrick Zahraj
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Patrick Zahraj
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Henrique Rocha
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Patrick Zahraj
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Kenny de Schepper
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Axel Nefve
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
82%
(
51 of
62)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
William Jansen
42%
(
18 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Dylan Dietrich
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (492/363) | Win/Loss | 57% (139/105) |
| 56% (1180/945) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (310/241) |
| 52% (10646/9721) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2763/2490) |
| 57% (153/114) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (19/17) |
| 57% (162/122) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (66/56) |
| 58% (136/99) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (49/28) |
| 59% (41/28) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 3063 | Aces Total | 857 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 2319 | Total Double Faults | 926 |
| 1:30:51 | Average Match Time | 1:29:5 |
| 452.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 381.36 |
| 58% (31824/54799) | 1st Serve % | 61% (8428/13719) |
| 71% (22500/31824) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5786/8428) |
| 52% (11911/22974) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2360/5291) |
| 41% (2296/5610) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (654/1519) |
| 40% (22226/55875) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5861/13974) |
| 50% (51/50) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (36/43) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (24/13) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (144/112) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 64% (177/98) | Challenger W/L | 57% (34/26) |
| 57% (60/46) | Futures W/L | 59% (103/73) |
| 59% (443/755) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (138/239) |
| 50% (45/90) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (149/320) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (36/66) |
| 55% (156/283) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (34/66) |
| 83% (484/401) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (140/120) |
| 17% (484/83) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (140/19) |
| 25% (371/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (104/19) |
Fucsovics vs. Zahraj Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
