M. Fucsovics
To Win
H. Rocha
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W LForm
W W W L W W W W L LThey have played 4 sets in total, with Fucsovics winning 2 and Vavassori winning 2. The last match between Fucsovics and Vavassori was at the Manama Challenger, 15-02-2025, Final, Hard with Marton Fucsovics getting the victory 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4.
Manama Challenger(15-02-2025)
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Andrea Vavassori
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
5-4 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Marton Fucsovics
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
74%
(
28 of
38)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
16 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
When analyzing the performance of the players in recent form, several key insights emerge. Firstly, in the last six months, Fucsovics has showcased remarkable proficiency in second serve performance, winning an impressive 57.67% of points. In contrast, Vavassori has achieved a slightly lower success rate, winning 51.22%. It is important to note the significant correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
In terms of return game stats, Fucsovics has demonstrated dominance in recent form, winning 51.37% of their opponent's second serve points. Vavassori's performance in this aspect has been commendable as well, with a success rate of 49.1%. These statistics extend to first serve returns, with Fucsovics securing 31.69% and Vavassori attaining 35%. This data proves to be highly influential in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis reveals the ability of each player to save breakpoints. Fucsovics has impressively saved 62.04% of breakpoints in recent form, while Vavassori has showcased a marginally higher percentage of 62.9%. This particular statistic holds great value in making in-game betting predictions.
An inclusive performance overview encompasses the entire last year, shedding light on each player's winning percentages. Fucsovics boasts a commendable record, emerging victorious in 61.22% of matches played, with a win/loss ratio of 30/19. Vavassori, on the other hand, has displayed a solid performance, securing a winning percentage of 54.84% and a win/loss record of 17/14. These figures provide an insightful overview for predicting their head-to-head matchup.
Moving on to analyzing surface preferences, Fucsovics exhibits their prowess on I.hard, with a stellar career win percentage of 58% (W/L 123/90). However, their performance on Hard surfaces is not far behind, with a win percentage of 57% (W/L 150/113). Conversely, Vavassori excels on Hard surfaces, boasting a career win percentage of 61% (W/L 86/56), whereas Grass seems to be their weaker surface, with a win percentage of 33% (W/L 4/8).
Furthermore, player level analysis reveals that Fucsovics has primarily competed on the Main tour in the last year, securing victory in an impressive 66.67% of matches played (W/L 16/8). On the other hand, Vavassori has participated in the Main tour as well, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/5). The event level at which players compete serves as a factor when comparing statistics to predict the favored player.
The direct head-to-head matches between Fucsovics and Vavassori have been limited in number, with only one previous encounter. Fucsovics has yet to secure a victory, while Vavassori emerged triumphant on that occasion. The last match between the two took place on the 14th of January 2020 at the Bendigo Challenger, played on a Second Hard surface, with Andrea Vavassori emerging victorious with a 5-4 retire.
The head-to-head match duration between these players has historically averaged at 0:51:4, indicating a relatively fast-paced game.
In terms of deciding sets, Fucsovics and Vavassori have encountered such situations on zero occasions. Thus, in the event that this match reaches a deciding set, predictions regarding the outcome become challenging.
Remarkably, these players have never faced each other in tiebreak situations, as all previous matches have concluded before such scenarios arose.
Considering the quality of opponents faced, Fucsovics has encountered players with an average rank of 143.94 over the past twelve months. In comparison, Vavassori has faced opponents with an average rank of 223.45 during the same duration.
Further analyzing the performance of deciding sets against all players, Fucsovics has emerged victorious in 47% of such instances within the last twelve months, while Vavassori has secured a higher success rate of 64% in all matches played on tour.
While past player performance provides valuable insights for predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to consider current event stats during an ongoing tournament. Such statistics give an indication of a player's current form and performance. For up-to-date details, kindly refer to the section below (if available) for a comprehensive overview.
Break point conversion rates offer valuable information for in-game live betting tips. Fucsovics has successfully converted 39.35% of breakpoint opportunities, while Vavassori has displayed even greater efficiency, converting 43.42% of their chances to break their opponent's serve.
For those interested in predictive models for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, please note that its content is tailored towards statistics enthusiasts.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Nardi
Player
Marton Fucsovics
50%
(
56 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
25 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Luca Nardi
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
10
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Jozef Kovalik
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Andrea Vavassori
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Viktor Durasovic
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Aziz Dougaz
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Nicolas Mejia
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 | 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Rubber 2 | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Andrea Vavassori
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Brandon Holt
57%
(
67 of
117)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
46 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Alexis Galarneau
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Andrea Vavassori
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-7(3) 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Niels Visker
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
12 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Fucsovics