Martina Trevisan vs Eva Vedder Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Martina Trevisan's recent second serve performance stands at 35.95%, whereas Eva Vedder has a higher success rate of 42.95%. Could this give Vedder an edge?
• When analyzing recent return stats, Trevisan is winning 51.54% of her opponent's second serve points, contrasting with Vedder's 46.95%.
• In first serve returns, Trevisan holds a slight advantage with 36.10% compared to Vedder's 30.81%.
• Vedder demonstrates superior breakpoint-saving abilities, managing to save 47.31% compared to Trevisan's 43.51%.
• Both players show distinct overall performance trends; Vedder has a better match win percentage of 58.57% over the past year, while Trevisan has won only 23.08% of her games.
• Trevisan excels on clay surfaces, boasting a 65% win rate, but struggles on grass at 8%. How does Vedder compare? She's most successful on hard courts with a 65% win rate and maintains a better performance on grass at 50%.
• Within similar tournament levels (Challengers/ITF > $10K), Vedder shows stronger results, winning 58.93% of her matches compared to Trevisan's 30.00%.
• Despite Vedder facing opponents with a lower average rank (315.34) compared to Trevisan's (185.08), she maintains successful outcomes.
• If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Trevisan has a 40% success rate, slightly higher than Vedder's 38%.
• Trevisan outperforms in break point conversions, sitting at 45.36% versus Vedder's 37.39%.

Editorial Prediction (November 24, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming match presents a fascinating dynamic between Martina Trevisan and Eva Vedder, offering numerous insights from their recent performances and historical data.

Eva Vedder's superior second serve success rate and overall match win percentage over the past year suggest she is in more consistent form. Additionally, her ability to save breakpoints adds to her competitive edge in high-pressure situations.

Contrastingly, Martina Trevisan exhibits strength in return games and break point conversions, which could be the deciding factor if these facets play a pivotal role in the match. However, her overall lower match win rate and struggles outside her favored clay surface are concerning.

Given these comparisons, Eva Vedder appears to have a slight advantage, largely due to her recent performance trends and confidence on diverse surfaces. Therefore, she is the tentative favorite to secure the win in this match-up.