Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martina Hingis vs Shahar Peer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hingis vs Peer analysis and find out who is favored!
Martina Hingis vs Shahar Peer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hingis has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hingis, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hingis has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hingis has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hingis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 82% (W/L 119/ 27), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6). Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 247/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/ 23).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hingis winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hingis winning 2 and Peer winning 1. The last match between Hingis and Peer was at the French Open - Paris, 05-06-2006, Fourth, Clay with Martina Hingis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hingis and Peer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hingis winning 1 times and Peer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hingis winning 0, and Peer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hingis has played against opponents with an average rank of while Peer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hingis has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hingis has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hingis 1 - 0 Peer
Ret.
Rank
4
High
43
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
11
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
80% (557-137)
Career Total W/L
58% (388-277)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,227,965
Career Prize Money
$2,894,734
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martina Hingis | Shahar Peer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (77/104) | 76% (63/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (44/77) | 49% (31/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 30% (8/27) | 35% (7/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 37% (7/19) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (45/83) | 50% (52/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Martina Hingis
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
52 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martina Hingis | Shahar Peer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Martina Hingis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-3(3) 4-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Martina Hingis
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Martina Hingis
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shuai Peng
Player
Martina Hingis
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Hingis
Player
Tian-Tian Sun
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Martina Hingis
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Hingis
Player
Pauline Parmentier
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Hingis
Player
Mathilde Johansson
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sania Mirza
Player
Martina Hingis
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Patty Schnyder
Player
Martina Hingis
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
74%
(
62 of
84)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shahar Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Valeria Gorlats
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Shahar Peer
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Shahar Peer
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Glushko
Player
Shahar Peer
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hingis Vs Peer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
