Martin Van Der Meerschen vs Karl William WURTH Mac-leay Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Meerschen vs Mac-leay analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Van Der Meerschen vs Karl William WURTH Mac-leay Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Meerschen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mac-leay has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Meerschen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mac-leay has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Meerschen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mac-leay has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Meerschen has won 100% of matches played (W/L 2/ 0), with Mac-leay winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Meerschen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 27/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mac-leay has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Meerschen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 100% of matches (W/L 2/ 0), where as Mac-leay has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Meerschen has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mac-leay has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Meerschen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mac-leay has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Meerschen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mac-leay has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Meerschen 0 - 0 Mac-leay
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Martin Van Der Meerschen | Karl William WURTH Mac-leay |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Martin Van Der Meerschen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Louis Larue
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Timo De Visser
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 3-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Karl William WURTH Mac-leay Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Lars Goran Verwerft
Player
Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Nicolas Acevedo
Player
Karl William Wurth Mac-Leay
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more