Martin Sabas vs Adam Panaras Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W L W L W W W L
Form
W L W L W L W L W LHead-to-head: Sabas 1 - 0 Panaras
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sabas winning 2 and Panaras winning 0. The last match between Sabas and Panaras was at the M15 Lannion, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Martin Sabas getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
M15 Lannion(17-02-2025)
6
1
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Sabas
Player
Adam Panaras
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
3
3
Aces (Total)
1
1
Total Double Faults
5
1:7:48
Average Match Time
1:7:48
61% (25/41)
1st Serve %
58% (33/57)
88% (22/25)
1st Serve Win %
55% (18/33)
63% (10/16)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (10/24)
36% (4/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
51% (29/57)
Return Points Win %
22% (9/41)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martin Sabas vs Adam Panaras Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martin Sabas 1 - 0 Adam Panaras
Predictions: The impending tennis match between Sabas and Panaras holds great anticipation, and with insightful analysis, we can make educated predictions about the outcome. Let's delve into the key factors that will shape this thrilling competition.
Second serve performance recent form: Examining their recent performances over the past six months, it is evident that Sabas has displayed exceptional prowess on their second serve, securing victory in an impressive 48.88% of points. On the other hand, Panaras, while still formidable, has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 40.88%. The significance of this statistic cannot be understated, as it bears a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Analyzing their return game statistics provides valuable insights. Sabas, in recent form, has triumphed in a remarkable 48.81% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Panaras has achieved a commendable rate of 43.23%. For first serve returns, Sabas boasts a success rate of 31.99%, while Panaras lags slightly behind at 20.18%. These numbers hold significant weight in determining which player may be favored in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis: When it comes to handling pressure situations, Sabas has displayed a commendable ability to save 55.29% of breakpoints in recent form. Panaras, meanwhile, has proven even more adept at saving breakpoints, with an impressive rate of 60.53%. This statistic holds crucial value for those engaging in in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Considering their overall performance in the past year, Sabas has emerged victorious in 58.82% of matches played (W/L 10/7), while Panaras has triumphed in 47.92% (W/L 23/25). This provides us with an encompassing overview for predicting the head-to-head outcome.
Best surface: Each player possesses a surface where they excel. Sabas has achieved their highest career win percentage on I.hard, with an impressive 57% (W/L 12/9). Conversely, their worst performance has been on I.hard with the same win percentage. Panaras, on the other hand, boasts a career win percentage of 53% (W/L 21/19) on Clay, their best surface, while their worst performance has been on I.hard with a win percentage of 44% (W/L 7/9).
Player level: Examining the level at which each player has competed is vital in predicting a favorite. In the past year, Sabas has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at $10K, where they have emerged victorious in an impressive 60% of matches played (W/L 9/6). Conversely, Panaras has primarily participated in the same level of tournaments, winning 47.92% of matches (W/L 23/25). It is crucial to note that when comparing player statistics, the event level at which they have been playing must be taken into consideration.
Opponent quality stats: The quality of opponents faced by each player also holds significance. Over the last 12 months, Sabas has encountered opponents with an average rank of 379.12, highlighting the challenges they have faced on the court. Panaras, in comparison, has competed against players with an average rank of 104, indicating a different level of competition.
Deciding set performance vs all players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, the performance of both players in deciding sets provides valuable insights. Over the last 12 months, Sabas has emerged victorious in 40% of deciding sets, a notable accomplishment. Panaras, however, has displayed an even more remarkable record, triumphing in 70% of all matches played on tour. These statistics carry weight when considering the potential outcome.
Current event H2H stats: While past player performance serves as a strong indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is vital to also consider current event statistics to gauge the current form of players. The section below provides a comprehensive overview of the event-specific performance. Moreover, certain players may exhibit enhanced performance at specific events, and this should not be overlooked when making predictions.
Break point conversion: The ability to convert breakpoint opportunities can be a decisive factor in a match. In recent form, Sabas has displayed an impressive conversion rate of 44.57%, making the most of their chances. Panaras, on the other hand, has converted 25% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serves. This statistic proves invaluable for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are intrigued by predictive models for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, I must warn you, it is intended for bona fide statistics enthusiasts.
Martin Sabas Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Martin Sabas
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Sabas
Player
Adan Freire Da Silva
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Sabas
Player
Kalomm Panzo
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nicolas Ifi
Player
Martin Sabas
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
63%
(
5 of
8)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
4
Total Points Won
10
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Sabas
Player
Adam Panaras
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
James Story
Player
Martin Sabas
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Sabas
Player
Ruslan Serazhetdinov
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Adrien Gobat
Player
Martin Sabas
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Adam Panaras Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Sabas
Player
Adam Panaras
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Adam Panaras
Player
Noe Macquart
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
71%
(
15 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
53%
(
8 of
15)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
52%
(
11 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
21
Total Points Won
21
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
59% (17/12)
Win/Loss
50% (50/50)
58% (38/27)
Sets Win/Loss
50% (112/114)
53% (332/297)
Games Win/Loss
49% (1097/1127)
0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss
53% (19/17)
0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss
52% (23/21)
59% (17/12)
Indoor Hard W/L
40% (8/12)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.28
Aces Per Game
0.15
87
Aces Total
165
0.24
Double Faults Per Game
0.12
75
Total Double Faults
134
1:25:50
Average Match Time
1st Match
264.14
Average Opponent Rank
137.28
60% (1110/1839)
1st Serve %
62% (2120/3396)
70% (775/1110)
1st Serve Win %
66% (1406/2120)
51% (371/729)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (611/1276)
43% (79/183)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (115/283)
40% (732/1832)
Return Points Win %
37% (1230/3290)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (1/2)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
62% (16/10)
Futures W/L
50% (50/50)
59% (17/29)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
49% (48/97)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
64% (7/11)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (15/28)
43% (3/7)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (14/27)
84% (19/16)
1st Set Won, Won Match
76% (51/39)
16% (19/3)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
24% (51/12)
10% (10/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (49/11)
Other Predictions
- Loading news...