Martin Landaluce vs Terence Atmane Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W W L
Form
W W L L L L W W L LH2H: Landaluce 1 - 0 Atmane
They have played 3 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 2 and Atmane winning 1. The last match between Landaluce and Atmane was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 19-06-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Grass, with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martin Landaluce | 1 |
| Terence Atmane | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Nottingham 2 Challenger(19-06-2025)
Martin Landaluce
Terence Atmane
6
7
6
2
6
3
| Landaluce | Stats | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (19-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (23-20) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 137 | Ranking | 124 |
| 133 | Highest Rank | 118 |
| 19 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 9 |
| 55% (87-70) | Career Total W/L | 61% (227-144) |
| $209,500 | Career Prize Money | $363,910 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Shelton PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 12 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:56:0 | Average Match Time | 1:56:0 |
| 70% (59/84) | 1st Serve % | 68% (60/88) |
| 75% (44/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (40/60) |
| 64% (16/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 38% (33/88) | Return Points Win % | 29% (24/84) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Landaluce vs Atmane Match Preview :
- Landaluce's second serve points won are 41.86%, while Atmane leads slightly with 46.96%. Is this a significant factor in predicting the match outcome? Yes, it has a high correlation with match predictions.
- In terms of returning second serve points, Landaluce wins 47.97%, whereas Atmane wins 45.12%. How does this affect the prediction? Better return stats are often favored in matchups.
- Landaluce has an edge in returning first serves, with 27.87% compared to Atmane’s 23.95% rate.
- Will pressure play a role? Landaluce saves 49.22% of breakpoints, trailing Atmane's proficient 63.03%.
- Over the last year, Landaluce has a 60% match win rate, slightly higher than Atmane's 56%. Does this convey consistency? Yes, but both have similar win-loss ratios.
- Surface preference might sway results: Landaluce excels on Grass with a 71% win rate, while Atmane prefers Hard, winning 65% of matches.
- Event-level analysis shows Landaluce has a slightly higher win rate (64.41%) in lower-tier tournaments compared to Atmane’s 60.38%.
- Facing higher-ranked opponents, Atmane has more experience, playing against an average rank of 234.88, compared to Landaluce's 262.21.
- Deciding set performances over the last year reveal Landaluce wins 59% of these sets, above Atmane’s 50% win rate in crucial moments.
- In converting break points, Landaluce has a slight advantage with a conversion rate of 33.15%, marginally above Atmane’s 32.99%.
Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Landaluce and Atmane presents an intriguing face-off. Second serve performance is crucial, and Atmane shows a slight edge over Landaluce in this area, which could be pivotal.
On the flip side, Landaluce displays a stronger capacity in returning serves, especially first serves, suggesting an advantage in dealing with Atmane’s service games. Additionally, consistency is suggested by Landaluce's slightly higher match win percentage over the past year.
Their performance under pressure and in deciding sets offers mixed insights. Atmane excels in saving breakpoints, yet Landaluce has a higher success rate in decisive matches. The context under which they have faced opponents also differs, with Atmane battling higher-ranked players on average.
Considering the strengths, weaknesses, and recent performances, Landaluce appears to have a slight edge, particularly on grass, suggesting they might emerge victorious in this duel.
Landaluce vs Atmane Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Martin Landaluce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
69 of
109)
1st Serve %
79%
(
79 of
100)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Francesco Passaro
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
124)
30
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
89%
(
55 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
62 of
84)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
44 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Adrian Mannarino
57%
(
77 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
29 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
44%
(
60 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Martin Landaluce
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Arthur Fery
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Terence Atmane
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (87/70) | Win/Loss | 61% (227/144) |
| 53% (204/178) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (516/360) |
| 51% (1885/1789) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4525/4049) |
| 64% (39/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (177/94) |
| 49% (34/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (37/29) |
| 43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 67% (8/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.51 |
| 602 | Aces Total | 2124 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 659 | Total Double Faults | 1247 |
| 1:54:1 | Average Match Time | 1:40:59 |
| 330.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 377.71 |
| 62% (7304/11704) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15697/26364) |
| 69% (5030/7304) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (11305/15697) |
| 49% (2143/4400) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5577/10667) |
| 41% (486/1197) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (964/2254) |
| 40% (4727/11806) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9811/25859) |
| 67% (6/3) | Slam W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 20% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 57% (12/9) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/7) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (11/14) |
| 57% (53/40) | Challenger W/L | 62% (92/56) |
| 64% (27/15) | Futures W/L | 65% (106/56) |
| 56% (86/154) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (223/362) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 50% (27/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (88/151) |
| 54% (35/65) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (72/135) |
| 82% (83/68) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (233/199) |
| 18% (83/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (233/34) |
| 26% (74/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (137/28) |
Landaluce vs. Atmane Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
