Martin Landaluce vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W W L
Form
L L L W W L L W L LHead To Head: Landaluce 2 - 0 Kjaer
They have played 5 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 4 and Kjaer winning 1. The last match between Landaluce and Kjaer was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 17-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Grass, with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martin Landaluce | 2 |
| Nicolai Budkov Kjaer | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Nottingham 2 Challenger(17-06-2025)
Martin Landaluce
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
6
2
2
6
6
2
| Landaluce | Stats | Kjaer |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (17-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (17-15) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 147 | Ranking | 307 |
| 133 | Highest Rank | 287 |
| 19 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 3 |
| 55% (85-69) | Career Total W/L | 61% (43-28) |
| $209,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Fonseca PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Brooksby PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 2-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 17 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:35:56 | Average Match Time | 1:35:56 |
| 58% (79/137) | 1st Serve % | 62% (85/137) |
| 71% (56/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (55/85) |
| 55% (32/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (18/52) |
| 73% (8/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
| 47% (64/137) | Return Points Win % | 36% (49/137) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Landaluce vs Kjaer Match Preview :
- When considering recent second serve performance, Kjaer holds a slight edge, winning 43.45% of points compared to Landaluce's 41.95%. Could this provide a crucial advantage?
- Landaluce demonstrates strength in return games, successfully winning 47.79% of second serve returns, surpassing Kjaer's 43.04%.
- Both players have similar statistics in first serve returns, with Kjaer slightly ahead at 28.16% versus Landaluce's 27.09%.
- Under pressure, Kjaer performs slightly better, saving 52.94% of breakpoints, whereas Landaluce saves 49.38%.
- Over the past year, Landaluce boasts a higher match win percentage at 59.42%, compared to Kjaer's 56.86%.
- Surface preference could play a role; Landaluce excels on Hard courts (64% win rate), while Kjaer performs best on I.hard surfaces (68% win rate).
- In terms of match levels, Landaluce has been more successful in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K with a 63.79% win rate, compared to Kjaer's 55.56%.
- In head-to-head matchups, Landaluce leads having won the sole match against Kjaer in straight sets.
- Considering opponent quality over the last year, Landaluce has faced tougher competition, opposing players with an average rank of 257.28 versus Kjaer's 330.65.
- Deciding set performances favor Kjaer, winning 59% of those matches compared to Landaluce's 56% win rate in such scenarios.
- Both players show comparable breakpoint conversions with Kjaer slightly ahead at 35.46%, against Landaluce's 35.06%.
Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the current statistics, Landaluce presents a formidable return game, especially on the opponent’s second serve, which could be a deciding factor in this match. However, Kjaer’s slight advantage in breakpoint saving and their success in deciding sets suggests resilience under pressure.
Their previous encounter saw Landaluce dominate, suggesting a psychological edge, yet Kjaer's strengths on I.hard surfaces could be pivotal if this match takes place under similar conditions.
Ultimately, though the statistics point towards a close contest, Landaluce’s consistent past success and stronger return game provide a slight edge. Thus, Landaluce appears the likelier victor in this upcoming match.
Landaluce vs Kjaer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Martin Landaluce Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
124)
30
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
89%
(
55 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
62 of
84)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
44 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Adrian Mannarino
57%
(
77 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
29 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
44%
(
60 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Martin Landaluce
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Lloyd Harris
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Hady Habib
73%
(
75 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
27
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
53 of
62)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
28 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Martin Landaluce
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
16
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Massimo Giunta
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Calvin Hemery
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (85/69) | Win/Loss | 61% (43/28) |
| 54% (200/173) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (96/67) |
| 51% (1847/1743) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (817/721) |
| 64% (39/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
| 49% (34/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (24/15) |
| 43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) |
| 67% (6/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 589 | Aces Total | 188 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 643 | Total Double Faults | 156 |
| 1:53:28 | Average Match Time | 1:34:53 |
| 332.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 377.38 |
| 62% (7118/11413) | 1st Serve % | 62% (2710/4403) |
| 69% (4899/7118) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1803/2710) |
| 49% (2098/4295) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (880/1693) |
| 41% (481/1176) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (213/463) |
| 40% (4631/11533) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1851/4406) |
| 67% (4/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (53/40) | Challenger W/L | 54% (15/13) |
| 64% (27/15) | Futures W/L | 74% (26/9) |
| 55% (84/152) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (43/70) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (26/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (10/18) |
| 52% (33/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (12/22) |
| 82% (82/67) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (38/35) |
| 18% (82/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (38/3) |
| 25% (72/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (33/8) |
Landaluce vs. Kjaer Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
