R. Peniston
To Win
M. Landaluce
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W W L WForm
W L L W W W L W L WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 2 and Evans winning 0. The last match between Landaluce and Evans was at the Prague Challenger, 07-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Martin Landaluce | 1 |
Daniel Evans | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Prague Challenger(07-05-2025)
Landaluce | Stats | Evans |
---|---|---|
53% (18-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (14-17) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
140 | Ranking | 170 |
133 | Highest Rank | 21 |
19 | Age | 35 |
- | Plays | R |
2 | Titles | 24 |
55% (86-69) | Career Total W/L | 59% (581-403) |
$209,500 | Career Prize Money | $5,084,865 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
- / Q2 round
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
1:26:41 | Average Match Time | 1:26:41 |
57% (32/56) | 1st Serve % | 48% (29/61) |
66% (21/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
42% (10/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (12/32) |
64% (7/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
57% (35/61) | Return Points Win % | 45% (25/56) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
As Evans and Landaluce face off, the statistics highlight key areas for an intriguing match. Evans has the upper hand in recent second serve success and break saving efficiency. However, Landaluce's superior return game could offset this advantage.
Although Evans competes against stronger opponents, Landaluce's overall performance in various competitions gives him a formidable edge. This is evident in his higher win rate over the past year and better performance in crucial deciding sets.
Surface-wise, both players have distinct strengths, but Evans' proficiency on indoor hard courts could prove advantageous. This battle might hinge on match conditions and who can capitalize on their favorable statistics during pivotal moments.
Considering the broader performance metrics and recent trends, Landaluce seems more likely to emerge victorious in this encounter, although the match is expected to be highly competitive.
Landaluce vs Evans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Francesco Passaro
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
124)
30
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
89%
(
55 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
62 of
84)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
44 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Adrian Mannarino
57%
(
77 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
29 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
44%
(
60 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Martin Landaluce
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Lloyd Harris
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Hady Habib
73%
(
75 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
27
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
53 of
62)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
28 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Frances Tiafoe
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ugo Humbert
Player
Daniel Evans
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Rinky Hijikata
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Mees Rottgering
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
78 of
110)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
50 of
78)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Adam Walton
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Murphy Cassone
Player
Daniel Evans
77%
(
70 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
55% (86/69) | Win/Loss | 59% (581/403) |
54% (202/174) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1376/1043) |
51% (1863/1757) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12182/11112) |
64% (39/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (248/157) |
49% (34/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (54/63) |
43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (181/113) |
70% (7/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (98/70) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
598 | Aces Total | 2749 |
0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
648 | Total Double Faults | 1979 |
1:53:38 | Average Match Time | 1:7:38 |
334.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.53 |
62% (7185/11509) | 1st Serve % | 61% (29863/48983) |
69% (4952/7185) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (21182/29863) |
49% (2110/4324) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9706/19119) |
41% (483/1183) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1853/4513) |
40% (4667/11628) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18755/49073) |
71% (5/2) | Slam W/L | 52% (47/43) |
20% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 42% (33/46) |
0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 43% (20/26) |
0% (0/7) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (110/100) |
57% (53/40) | Challenger W/L | 62% (165/103) |
64% (27/15) | Futures W/L | 71% (205/84) |
56% (85/153) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (538/890) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (39/84) |
50% (27/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (188/357) |
53% (34/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (181/334) |
82% (83/68) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (573/485) |
18% (83/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (573/85) |
25% (72/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (410/97) |