Martin Landaluce vs Clement Chidekh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L L L L
Form
L L L L W W L L L LHead-to-head: Landaluce 0 - 1 Chidekh
They have played 2 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 0 and Chidekh winning 2. The last match between Landaluce and Chidekh was at the Open 13 Provence - Marseille, 09-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Open 13 Provence - Marseille(09-02-2025)
6
3
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
6
Games Won
12
9
Aces (Total)
4
6
Total Double Faults
2
1:29:17
Average Match Time
1:29:17
63% (39/62)
1st Serve %
56% (34/61)
64% (25/39)
1st Serve Win %
79% (27/34)
30% (7/23)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (12/27)
33% (2/6)
Break Points Won % (Total)
63% (5/8)
36% (22/61)
Return Points Win %
48% (30/62)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martin Landaluce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Martin Landaluce
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
20
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
76)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-7(2) 6-3 16-14 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Martin Landaluce
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
14
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
8
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
18 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
0
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
7
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
3
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Raphael Collignon
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Martin Landaluce
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Dane Sweeny
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
10
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Clement Chidekh
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Clement Chidekh
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Luca Van Assche
51%
(
57 of
112)
1st Serve %
71%
(
82 of
116)
6
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
50 of
82)
49%
(
27 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Clement Chidekh
55%
(
79 of
144)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
16
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
46%
(
30 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
41%
(
59 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
128
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Clement Chidekh
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Clement Chidekh
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
51 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Clement Chidekh
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
56% (73/58)
Win/Loss
66% (152/78)
54% (171/143)
Sets Win/Loss
63% (331/194)
52% (1551/1443)
Games Win/Loss
55% (2662/2138)
64% (39/22)
Hard Win/Loss
69% (70/31)
50% (28/28)
Clay Win/Loss
50% (7/7)
43% (6/8)
Indoor Hard W/L
66% (74/38)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
33% (1/2)
0.34
Aces Per Game
0.22
504
Aces Total
517
0.34
Double Faults Per Game
0.29
493
Total Double Faults
670
1:51:56
Average Match Time
1:33:21
330.77
Average Opponent Rank
392.38
62% (5943/9520)
1st Serve %
62% (8978/14403)
69% (4089/5943)
1st Serve Win %
67% (6041/8978)
49% (1759/3577)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (2816/5425)
41% (408/1000)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (798/1682)
40% (3877/9623)
Return Points Win %
43% (6510/15016)
75% (3/1)
Slam W/L
50% (2/2)
25% (1/3)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/5)
Main Tour W/L
44% (4/5)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (42/33)
Challenger W/L
49% (31/32)
64% (27/15)
Futures W/L
75% (115/39)
56% (72/129)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
66% (149/226)
50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
47% (20/43)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
51% (25/49)
50% (25/50)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (38/67)
82% (72/59)
1st Set Won, Won Match
90% (149/134)
18% (72/13)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
10% (149/15)
24% (59/14)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (81/17)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
