D. Medvedev
To Win
C. Norrie
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W L W LForm
W L W L W W W W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 1 and Norrie winning 2. The last match between Landaluce and Norrie was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 24-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Cameron Norrie getting the victory 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Martin Landaluce | 0 |
Cameron Norrie | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(24-04-2025)
Landaluce | Stats | Norrie |
---|---|---|
46% (11-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (18-15) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
147 | Ranking | 90 |
133 | Highest Rank | 8 |
19 | Age | 29 |
- | Plays | L |
2 | Titles | 11 |
54% (79-66) | Career Total W/L | 62% (392-242) |
$166,500 | Career Prize Money | $8,150,345 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
26 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Martin Landaluce
69%
(
79 of
114)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
7
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
15
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
43 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
16 | Games Won | 19 |
12 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
15 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
2:41:28 | Average Match Time | 2:41:28 |
67% (73/109) | 1st Serve % | 69% (79/114) |
68% (50/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (52/79) |
39% (14/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (19/35) |
30% (3/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
38% (43/114) | Return Points Win % | 41% (45/109) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
What tales do the numbers tell as we preview the upcoming showdown between Norrie and Landaluce? When we delve deep into the recent performance on the second serve, Landaluce edges just slightly ahead, claiming 45.56% of points compared to Norrie's 42.96%. Such marginal differences can be fundamental, given the strong correlation between second-serve performance and the eventual match victor.
Turning our gaze to the return game, we observe Landaluce again holding a slight advantage, winning 48.39% of their opponent's second-serve points, in comparison to Norrie's 47.29%. When facing first serves, however, Norrie turns the tables, snatching 26.64% of points while Landaluce secures 23.97%. This nuanced dance of stats often hints at who might come out on top in today's head-to-head duel.
Pressure moments are where champions rise and fall – saving breakpoints is critical. Here, both players perform admirably, but Norrie shines just a bit brighter, saving 53.17% of breakpoints compared to Landaluce's 51.7%. Such precision can be pivotal in shaping the match outcome.
A glance over the past year's performance shows Landaluce winning 59.68% of their matches, surpassing Norrie's 46.67%. Yet, context is key. Norrie's battles have been on the Main tour against an average opponent rank of 114.44, contrasting Landaluce's encounters with challengers averaging a rank of 269.1.
Both athletes favor the hard courts, with Norrie boasting a 67% win rate and Landaluce close behind at 64%. Yet, their lesser surfaces tell different stories – Norrie struggles on grass while Landaluce finds it tough on indoor hard courts. Such insights steer predictions when eyeing surfaces.
As we ponder their capability of handling the pressure of a deciding set, both players have secured 53% victories in these crucial moments. Experience on the center stage and regular exposure to high-stakes scenarios might give one competitor an advantage in the clutch moments.
Finally, if we focus on opportunity conversion, Landaluce has been more clinical, converting 35.42% of breakpoints compared to Norrie's 30.56%. A critical stat for those making live predictions.
With these metrics weighed and considered, Landaluce appears to hold a slight statistical edge. However, in the unpredictable theater of tennis, where grit and determination collide, anything remains possible. As such, each rally, return, and breakpoint will etch the narrative of this match.
Landaluce vs Norrie Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Martin Landaluce
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62%
(
29 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Murkel Dellien
63%
(
71 of
113)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
112)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Jurij Rodionov
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
59 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Martin Landaluce
61%
(
82 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
42%
(
57 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Benjamin Hassan
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
120)
2
Aces
4
16
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Novak Djokovic
Player
Cameron Norrie
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
45 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
19 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Alexei Popyrin
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Tomas Machac
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Dominic Stricker
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Jenson Brooksby
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Ergi Kirkin
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Cameron Norrie
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Christopher O'Connell
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54% (79/66) | Win/Loss | 62% (392/242) |
54% (187/162) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (916/656) |
51% (1720/1628) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7991/7033) |
64% (39/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (229/111) |
49% (34/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (88/53) |
43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (49/50) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (26/28) |
0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
538 | Aces Total | 2634 |
0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
593 | Total Double Faults | 1620 |
1:52:49 | Average Match Time | 1:36:23 |
335.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 337.72 |
62% (6618/10621) | 1st Serve % | 65% (28318/43784) |
68% (4531/6618) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (19874/28318) |
49% (1954/4003) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7791/15466) |
41% (458/1119) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1806/4223) |
40% (4371/10793) | Return Points Win % | 39% (17227/44048) |
67% (4/2) | Slam W/L | 57% (38/29) |
20% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 56% (61/48) |
0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 42% (11/15) |
0% (0/7) | Main Tour W/L | 62% (153/95) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/2) |
56% (47/37) | Challenger W/L | 66% (71/36) |
64% (27/15) | Futures W/L | 77% (58/17) |
55% (78/143) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (353/565) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 54% (35/65) |
50% (24/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (103/204) |
49% (28/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (127/212) |
82% (78/64) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (382/328) |
18% (78/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (382/52) |
22% (67/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (252/61) |