Martin Landaluce vs Benjamin Hassan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W W L
Form
L W W L W W W L L LH2H: Landaluce 1 - 1 Hassan
They have played 6 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 3 and Hassan winning 3. The last match between Landaluce and Hassan was at the Mauthausen Challenger, 28-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 7-5 5-7 7-6(1).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martin Landaluce | 1 |
| Benjamin Hassan | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mauthausen Challenger(28-04-2025)
Martin Landaluce
Benjamin Hassan
7
5
5
7
7
6
| Landaluce | Stats | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (17-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (17-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 147 | Ranking | 195 |
| 133 | Highest Rank | 143 |
| 19 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 2 |
| 55% (85-69) | Career Total W/L | 59% (324-227) |
| $209,500 | Career Prize Money | $340,000 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Frech VS Tauson PREDICTION Grass
Bad Homburg Open - Bad Homburg wta
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Diallo VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 5-7 7-6(1) |
Stats 
Martin Landaluce
Player
Benjamin Hassan
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
120)
2
Aces
4
16
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Martin Landaluce
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 30 | Games Won | 36 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 16 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:29:2 | Average Match Time | 2:29:2 |
| 63% (136/215) | 1st Serve % | 54% (128/235) |
| 62% (84/136) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (86/128) |
| 49% (39/79) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (48/107) |
| 32% (8/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (12/23) |
| 43% (101/235) | Return Points Win % | 43% (92/215) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Landaluce vs Hassan Match Preview :
Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Hassan has won 44.84% of points, slightly trailing Landaluce, who has achieved 45.18%. This metric is known for its strong correlation with successful match predictions. When it comes to returning games, Hassan has captured 46.59% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Landaluce has managed a slightly higher 48.22%. For first serve returns, Hassan leads at 29.42%, compared to Landaluce's 24.8%, which offers a crucial insight into predicting the favored player in head-to-head matchups.
In terms of handling pressure, Hassan has successfully saved 58.53% of break points, outperforming Landaluce, who has saved 51.61%. This statistic can be instrumental for those keen on in-game betting predictions. Reviewing the past year, both players' performance shows Hassan winning 50% of their matches (W/L 37/37), while Landaluce has a winning percentage of 58.73% (W/L 37/26), contributing to an overall head-to-head prediction perspective.
Considering their preferred surfaces, Hassan excels on clay, with a win rate of 62% (W/L 192/120), but fares poorly on grass with a 40% win rate (W/L 2/3). In contrast, Landaluce's most successful surface is hard courts with a 64% win rate (W/L 39/22), while indoor hard courts prove challenging with only a 43% win rate (W/L 6/8). Hassan and Landaluce have played each other once before, with Hassan emerging victorious, enhancing the outlook in direct confrontations.
Focusing on performance levels, Hassan has mostly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, winning 50.88% of these matches (W/L 29/28). Landaluce, however, shows stronger results in the same category, winning 62.96% (W/L 34/20). A critical point conversion analysis reveals that Hassan converts 39.41% of break opportunities, whereas Landaluce achieves a 34.91% conversion rate, which is a crucial indicator for live match predictions.
Examining their head-to-head history further, Hassan and Landaluce have played one match comprising three sets, with Hassan winning two of them, including a match at the Brest Challenger. They have gone to a deciding set once, with Hassan winning it, offering insight into match predictions should this encounter extend into a deciding set. Although Hassan has not won against Landaluce in tiebreaks, having lost their sole tiebreak encounter, Hassan's higher opponent quality average rank (222.42) versus Landaluce's (266.27) over the last year implies readiness for tougher matches.
Taking into account their current and past performance metrics, Hassan emerges as the stronger candidate to win the upcoming match against Landaluce. The statistics align in favor of Hassan, making them the likely victor.
Landaluce vs Hassan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Martin Landaluce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
124)
30
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
89%
(
55 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
62 of
84)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
44 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Adrian Mannarino
57%
(
77 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
29 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
44%
(
60 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Martin Landaluce
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Lloyd Harris
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Hady Habib
73%
(
75 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
27
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
53 of
62)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
28 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Martin Landaluce
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
16
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Benjamin Hassan
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
11
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
6
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Benjamin Hassan
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Hassan
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Pavel Kotov
40%
(
36 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Benjamin Hassan
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Damir Dzumhur
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (85/69) | Win/Loss | 59% (324/227) |
| 54% (200/173) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (736/573) |
| 51% (1847/1743) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6474/6001) |
| 64% (39/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (59/41) |
| 49% (34/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (197/124) |
| 43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (66/57) |
| 67% (6/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 589 | Aces Total | 1919 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 643 | Total Double Faults | 1625 |
| 1:53:28 | Average Match Time | 1:24:26 |
| 332.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.61 |
| 62% (7118/11413) | 1st Serve % | 55% (19149/34601) |
| 69% (4899/7118) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (13197/19149) |
| 49% (2098/4295) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7793/15455) |
| 41% (481/1176) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1448/3460) |
| 40% (4631/11533) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13779/34611) |
| 67% (4/2) | Slam W/L | 50% (6/6) |
| 20% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 68% (15/7) |
| 0% (0/7) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (10/11) |
| 57% (53/40) | Challenger W/L | 54% (164/138) |
| 64% (27/15) | Futures W/L | 68% (125/60) |
| 55% (84/152) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (315/539) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 49% (26/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (91/171) |
| 52% (33/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (115/207) |
| 82% (82/67) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (302/260) |
| 18% (82/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (302/41) |
| 25% (72/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (249/62) |
Landaluce vs. Hassan Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
