M. Landaluce
To Win
N. Gombos
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W L LForm
W W W L W W W W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 2 and Mannarino winning 1. The last match between Landaluce and Mannarino was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 17-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Grass, with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 4-6 7-5 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Martin Landaluce | 1 |
Adrian Mannarino | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Nottingham 2 Challenger(17-06-2025)
Landaluce | Stats | Mannarino |
---|---|---|
51% (19-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (21-28) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
138 | Ranking | 93 |
133 | Highest Rank | 17 |
19 | Age | 37 |
- | Plays | L |
2 | Titles | 25 |
55% (87-71) | Career Total W/L | 55% (694-573) |
$209,500 | Career Prize Money | $7,153,275 |
1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
Citi Open - Washington atp
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 7-5 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Adrian Mannarino
57%
(
77 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
29 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
44%
(
60 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
126
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 16 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
3:20:10 | Average Match Time | 3:20:10 |
57% (77/136) | 1st Serve % | 57% (62/109) |
61% (47/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (44/62) |
49% (29/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (22/47) |
45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 22% (4/18) |
39% (43/109) | Return Points Win % | 44% (60/136) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
As we look into this upcoming matchup, the second serve performance gives Mannarino a slight advantage. However, it is Landaluce’s ability to return serves effectively that brings balance to the playing field, slightly challenging Mannarino's edge.
Mannarino's composure under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints is noteworthy. Yet, Landaluce's overall match-winning rate in the past year complements his effective breakpoint conversions, painting him as a formidable opponent.
While both players share similar strengths on grass surfaces, and Mannarino has main tour experience, it is the context of Landaluce’s frequent wins in lower-tier events that heighten his competitive spirit.
Ultimately, accounting for the match dynamics, surface preference, and in-play capabilities, Landaluce's recent performance streak, combined with his competency in crucial game moments, slightly positions him as the favored player to secure victory in this tie. Therefore, Landaluce is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Landaluce vs Mannarino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
David Goffin
Player
Martin Landaluce
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
7%
(
1 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
24%
(
17 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Bolt
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
69 of
109)
1st Serve %
79%
(
79 of
100)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Francesco Passaro
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
124)
30
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
89%
(
55 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
62 of
84)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
44 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Adrian Mannarino
57%
(
77 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
29 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
44%
(
60 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
James Duckworth
Player
Adrian Mannarino
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Zachary Svajda
Player
Adrian Mannarino
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Antoine Ghibaudo
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Bernard Tomic
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Tyler Zink
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Andrey Rublev
Player
Adrian Mannarino
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
14
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Valentin Royer
60%
(
78 of
129)
1st Serve %
64%
(
93 of
146)
18
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
67 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
63 of
93)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
33 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
52 of
146)
148
Total Points Won
127
|
6-4 6-4 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
55% (87/71) | Win/Loss | 55% (694/573) |
53% (204/180) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1642/1441) |
51% (1894/1802) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (15025/14355) |
64% (39/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (270/205) |
48% (34/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (80/132) |
43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (236/166) |
67% (8/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (108/70) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
608 | Aces Total | 4590 |
0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
666 | Total Double Faults | 2397 |
1:54:3 | Average Match Time | 1:16:29 |
334.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.52 |
62% (7367/11800) | 1st Serve % | 60% (44239/73457) |
69% (5070/7367) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (30989/44239) |
49% (2160/4433) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (15053/29218) |
40% (486/1204) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2788/6649) |
40% (4744/11878) | Return Points Win % | 38% (28025/73975) |
67% (6/3) | Slam W/L | 50% (69/70) |
20% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 41% (73/103) |
0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 80% (8/2) |
0% (0/8) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (236/227) |
57% (53/40) | Challenger W/L | 64% (207/117) |
64% (27/15) | Futures W/L | 65% (101/54) |
55% (86/155) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (637/1144) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (53/116) |
49% (27/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (212/428) |
54% (35/65) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (204/391) |
82% (83/68) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (670/564) |
18% (83/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (670/104) |
25% (75/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (596/126) |