Martin Klizan vs Samuel Groth Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Klizan vs Groth analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Klizan vs Samuel Groth Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Klizan has won 53.94% of points on his second serve, while Groth has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Klizan, in recent form, has won 55.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Groth has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.04% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Klizan has saved 48.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Groth has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Klizan has won 80.95% of matches played (W/L 17/ 4), with Groth winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Klizan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 292/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 4/ 15). Groth has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 85/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 199/ 177).
- Player level: In the last year, Klizan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 15/ 3), where as Groth has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Klizan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Klizan winning 2 and Groth winning 0. The last match between Klizan and Groth was at the Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai, 07-10-2014, First, Hard with Martin Klizan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Klizan and Groth have played a deciding set 0 times, with Klizan winning 0 times and Groth 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Klizan winning 1, and Groth 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Klizan has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.43 while Groth has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Klizan has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Groth has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Klizan has converted 54.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Groth has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Klizan 1 - 0 Groth
18
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
6
Main
5
Minor
843
Rank
24
High
34
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
53
High
36
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
7
Minor
Form
58% (479-350)
Career Total W/L
57% (387-296)
82% (14-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,947,100
Career Prize Money
$650,305
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Martin Klizan | Samuel Groth |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 12 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:8:58 | 1:8:58 |
1st Serve % | 74% (46/62) | 69% (38/55) |
1st Serve Win% | 83% (38/46) | 82% (31/38) |
2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 47% (8/17) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 29% (16/55) | 21% (13/62) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(1) 6-3 |
Martin Klizan
Player
Samuel Groth
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
7
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
16 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Martin Klizan | Samuel Groth |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 82% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 72% (26/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 60% (185/125) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 85% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.24 | 0 |
Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
DFs Total | 22 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:10:42 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 198.18 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (415/734) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (288/415) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (170/319) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 51% (41/80) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (329/746) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 86% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (12/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Martin Klizan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Martin Klizan
Player
Sander Jong
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Martin Klizan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Klizan
Player
Michael Agwi
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
2
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
114)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Martin Klizan
Player
Edas Butvilas
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Martin Klizan
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65%
(
28 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Samuel Groth Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
46%
(
12 of
26)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Manuel Sanchez
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
13
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
8
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
11%
(
6 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
Alexander Bublik
Player
Samuel Groth
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H |
view more