Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Klizan vs Hyeon Chung Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Klizan vs Chung analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Klizan vs Hyeon Chung Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Klizan has won 53.75% of points on his second serve, while Chung has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Klizan, in recent form, has won 55.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chung has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.1% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Klizan has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chung has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Klizan has won 82.61% of matches played (W/L 19/ 4), with Chung winning 14.29% (W/L 1/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Klizan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 294/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 4/ 15). Chung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 194/ 88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Klizan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85% of matches (W/L 17/ 3), where as Chung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Klizan winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Klizan winning 1 and Chung winning 4. The last match between Klizan and Chung was at the BMW Open - Munich, 04-05-2018, Quarterfinals, Clay with Hyeon Chung getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 8:53:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Klizan and Chung have played a deciding set 1 times, with Klizan winning 0 times and Chung 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Klizan winning 0, and Chung 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Klizan has played against opponents with an average rank of 146.48 while Chung has played against players with an average rank of 172.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Klizan has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chung has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Klizan has converted 55.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chung has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Klizan 0 - 2 Chung
843
Rank
24
High
34
Age
L
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
499
Rank
19
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
58% (481-350)
Career Total W/L
65% (243-132)
84% (16-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,947,100
Career Prize Money
$2,529,406
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martin Klizan | Hyeon Chung |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 19 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 8:53:53 | 8:53:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (88/166) | 60% (75/125) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (51/88) | 79% (59/75) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (43/78) | 52% (26/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 38% (8/21) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (40/125) | 43% (72/166) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Hyeon Chung
Player
Martin Klizan
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Martin Klizan
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Klizan | Hyeon Chung |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 84% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 75% (30/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 61% (209/134) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 85% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:18 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 177.32 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (488/868) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (336/488) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (202/380) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (51/97) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (390/857) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (14/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 82% (14/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (14/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (14/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Martin Klizan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Iliyan Radulov
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Ivan Perez Martin
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Sander Jong
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Martin Klizan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Michael Agwi
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
2
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
114)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Edas Butvilas
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Hyeon Chung
50%
(
12 of
24)
1st Serve %
71%
(
15 of
21)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
7 of
12)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
46%
(
11 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
26
Total Points Won
19
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Murray
Player
Hyeon Chung
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Hyeon Chung
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Baptiste Crepatte
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
2
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
9 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Hyeon Chung
35%
(
24 of
69)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Klizan Vs Chung Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Martin Klizan
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
