Martin Klizan vs Gastao Elias Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L L L W L
Form
W W W W L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Klizan 1 - 2 Elias
They have played 8 sets in total, with Klizan winning 3 and Elias winning 5. The last match between Klizan and Elias was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, Hard with Gastao Elias getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | 1 |
| Gastao Elias | 2 |
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(14-02-2025)
6
1
7
5
| Klizan | Stats | Elias |
|---|---|---|
| 40% (4-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (14-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 296 | Ranking | 332 |
| 24 | Highest Rank | 57 |
| 35 | Age | 34 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 21 | Titles | 17 |
| 58% (521-375) | Career Total W/L | 56% (569-454) |
| $2,947,100 | Career Prize Money | $414,541 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Minaur VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Linette VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Gastao Elias
Player
Martin Klizan
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
20%
(
1 of
5)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
12
Total Points Won
3
|
||||
| 3-6 6-2 7-6(4) 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 34 | Games Won | 41 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:3:51 | Average Match Time | 0:3:51 |
| 20% (1/5) | 1st Serve % | 60% (6/10) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Serve Win % | 100% (6/6) |
| 25% (1/4) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 20% (2/10) | Return Points Win % | 80% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martin Klizan vs Gastao Elias Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martin Klizan 1 - 2 Gastao Elias
- Recent Form of Second Serve Performance: Klizan has demonstrated an impressive prowess in their second serve performance, winning 51.12% of points in the last six months. Conversely, Elias has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 44.86% in this area. It is noteworthy to mention that there exists a substantial correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Analysis of Return Game Statistics: Recent return game statistics exhibit Klizan's dominance over their opponents' second serve points, with a success rate of 52.02%. In contrast, Elias boasts a slightly higher figure of 52.27% in this regard. The discrepancy is even more apparent when considering first serve returns, with Klizan at 30.99% and Elias at 33.83%. These figures bear significant weight in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Assessment: Examining the players' ability to handle pressure situations, Klizan proves to be a resilient competitor, saving 56.86% of breakpoints in recent form. Elias, though slightly lower, showcases their proficiency in saving breakpoints with a success rate of 54.95%. This particular statistic holds great value when making in-game betting predictions.
- Overall Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Klizan has emerged victorious in an impressive 72.22% of matches played (52 wins, 20 losses). Elias, while still commendable, has a slightly lower success rate of 52.17% (36 wins, 33 losses). This comprehensive overview provides a holistic perspective on their head-to-head performance throughout the year.
- Surface Specialization: Klizan exhibits exceptional proficiency on clay courts, winning 64% of matches played (326 wins, 187 losses). Comparatively, their performance on grass courts is notably weaker, with a win percentage of only 21% (4 wins, 15 losses). Elias, on the other hand, excels on clay courts with a win rate of 57% (363 wins, 269 losses), while struggling on grass courts where they have achieved only a 25% win rate (3 wins, 9 losses).
- Player Level Analysis: In the past year, Klizan predominantly engaged in matches within the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10K, achieving an impressive win rate of 86.05% (37 wins, 6 losses). Conversely, Elias's focus was primarily on the Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, with a win rate of 50.79% (32 wins, 31 losses). When comparing player statistics to predict a favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative skill level of the events they have participated in.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: Klizan and Elias have previously crossed paths on two occasions, resulting in one victory for Klizan and another for Elias. Throughout these encounters, both players have engaged in six gripping sets, with an equal distribution of victories, each winning three. The most recent match between them occurred at the Davis Cup, Group I, PO, SVK-POR on September 14, 2012. In an intense battle, Martin Klizan emerged triumphant with a scoreline of 3-6, 6-2, 7-6(4), 6-2.
- Average Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Notably, the average match duration between Klizan and Elias in their previous head-to-head battles has yet to be determined.
- Prediction for Deciding Sets: Klizan and Elias have not faced each other in a deciding set thus far. However, if this match were to reach such a critical stage, Klizan's track record suggests a winning outcome in 50% of deciding sets played over the past year. On the contrary, Elias has proven slightly more successful, triumphing in 53% of all matches that progressed to the deciding set.
- Head-to-Head Intensity in Pressure Situations: Throughout their encounters, Klizan and Elias have participated in one tiebreak, with Klizan emerging victorious in the sole instance while Elias failed to secure a win.
- Opponent Quality Analysis: In the last twelve months, Klizan has contested against opponents boasting an average ranking of 206.65. Similarly, Elias's adversaries possess an average ranking of 216.3. This statistic sheds light on the level of competition both players have faced.
- Deciding Set Performance Against All Opponents: When evaluating their ability to perform in deciding sets, Klizan has proven their mettle, triumphing in 50% of such sets over the past year. Elias, on the other hand, boasts a slightly higher success rate of 53% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics offer valuable insights for in-game predictions and live betting.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While an understanding of past player performance significantly aids in predicting tennis matches, it is crucial to assess their current event performance for indications of their current form. Therefore, it is recommended to refer to the section below (available at the provided link) for up-to-date statistics if the players have already played matches in the current event. Furthermore, certain players may exhibit superior performances at specific events, necessitating their consideration when predicting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion Rates: In recent form, Klizan has showcased an impressive ability to convert breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on 50% of such chances. Elias, likewise, displays a strong performance by converting 51.04% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve. These statistics hold tremendous value for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player finds themselves facing a breakpoint.
- If you are seeking sophisticated models to predict tennis matches, I recommend exploring this article (Caveat: Only intended for statisticians and enthusiasts).
Martin Klizan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Martin Klizan
59%
(
65 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Marco Cecchinato
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Martin Klizan
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Martin Klizan
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Klizan
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Martin Klizan
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Alexander Petrov
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Martin Klizan
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
20%
(
1 of
5)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
12
Total Points Won
3
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Francisco Rocha
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Anthony Genov
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
41%
(
9 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
67%
(
26 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
24
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Gastao Elias Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Gastao Elias
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Gastao Elias
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Francisco Rocha
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Gastao Elias
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Ryan Peniston
45%
(
9 of
20)
1st Serve %
40%
(
2 of
5)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
13
Total Points Won
12
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
50%
(
59 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
42%
(
25 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
53 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
117
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Sergey Fomin
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (521/375) | Win/Loss | 56% (569/454) |
| 56% (1200/953) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1299/1128) |
| 52% (10531/9740) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11876/11042) |
| 49% (88/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (171/132) |
| 63% (327/189) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (363/270) |
| 56% (102/81) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (32/43) |
| 21% (4/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2605 | Aces Total | 2952 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2215 | Total Double Faults | 2277 |
| 1:11:10 | Average Match Time | 1:20:54 |
| 556.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 548.61 |
| 58% (27961/48544) | 1st Serve % | 54% (30903/57188) |
| 69% (19261/27961) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (21728/30903) |
| 50% (10305/20583) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (13112/26281) |
| 44% (2064/4648) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2590/5991) |
| 39% (18384/46546) | Return Points Win % | 41% (23637/58177) |
| 44% (30/38) | Slam W/L | 40% (19/28) |
| 31% (15/34) | Masters W/L | 8% (1/12) |
| 68% (21/10) | Cups W/L | 44% (7/9) |
| 60% (144/97) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (61/64) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (191/144) | Challenger W/L | 56% (365/286) |
| 70% (120/51) | Futures W/L | 68% (115/54) |
| 60% (480/805) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (554/978) |
| 42% (30/72) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 53% (159/301) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (143/304) |
| 57% (159/277) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (216/363) |
| 85% (500/425) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (510/431) |
| 15% (500/75) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (510/77) |
| 24% (393/93) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (510/138) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
