Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Damm vs Frantisek Cermak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Damm vs Cermak analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Damm vs Frantisek Cermak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Damm has won 49.9% of points on his second serve, while Cermak has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Damm, in recent form, has won 45.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cermak has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.18% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Damm has saved 72.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cermak has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Damm has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 55/ 30), with Cermak winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 42/ 39). Cermak has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 18/ 13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 37% (W/L 21/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 30/ 21), where as Cermak has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Damm has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.41 while Cermak has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Damm has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cermak has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Damm has converted 36.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cermak has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Damm 0 - 0 Cermak
177
Rank
175
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
201
High
47
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
57% (135-101)
Career Total W/L
53% (167-147)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$107,985
Career Prize Money
$36,385
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Damm | Frantisek Cermak |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (29/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (308/305) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 337 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 108 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 328.84 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1186/2001) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (920/1186) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (397/815) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (43/117) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (620/1878) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (9/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Filip Misolic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Frantisek Cermak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Anton Zaitcev
Player
Frantisek Cermak
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Frantisek Cermak
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
13
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
8 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivo Minar
Player
Frantisek Cermak
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
58)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Frantisek Cermak
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Frantisek Cermak
Player
Giuliano Ales
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Richard Becker
Player
Frantisek Cermak
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
19 of
35)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Frantisek Cermak
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
38%
(
16 of
42)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joan-Marc Grimal-Ferrer
Player
Frantisek Cermak
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Damm Vs Cermak Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
