Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Damm vs Andrew Paulson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our vs Paulson analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Damm vs Andrew Paulson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Paulson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show , in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paulson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paulson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Paulson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, has played against opponents with an average rank of while Paulson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paulson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paulson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: 0 - 0 Paulson
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
VS Paulson H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Filip Misolic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Andrew Paulson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Andrew Paulson
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
10
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Andrew Paulson
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
101)
20
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Andrew Paulson
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
9
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
6 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
84)
13
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Louis Wessels
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
19
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Tom Gentzsch
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
11
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Jakob Schnaitter
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Andrew Paulson
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
11
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andrew Paulson
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Andrew Paulson
80%
(
68 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vs Paulson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
