Marsel Ilhan vs Naoki Nakagawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilhan vs Nakagawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Marsel Ilhan vs Naoki Nakagawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilhan has won 47.64% of points on his second serve, while Nakagawa has won 50.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilhan, in recent form, has won 54.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakagawa has won 45.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.67% and 31.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilhan has saved 45.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakagawa has saved 61.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilhan has won 60% of matches played (W/L 21/ 14), with Nakagawa winning 63.83% (W/L 30/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilhan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 303/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22). Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 175/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilhan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.38% of matches (W/L 19/ 13), where as Nakagawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.13% of matches (W/L 25/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilhan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilhan winning 2 and Nakagawa winning 0. The last match between Ilhan and Nakagawa was at the M15 Antalya, 19-05-2021, First, Clay with Marsel Ilhan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilhan and Nakagawa have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilhan winning 0 times and Nakagawa 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ilhan winning 1, and Nakagawa 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilhan has played against opponents with an average rank of 78.09 while Nakagawa has played against players with an average rank of 197.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilhan has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakagawa has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilhan has converted 51.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakagawa has converted 48.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilhan 1 - 0 Nakagawa
23
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
877
Rank
77
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
431
Rank
334
High
27
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
59% (641-449)
Career Total W/L
61% (295-192)
55% (6-5)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$591,915
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marsel Ilhan | Naoki Nakagawa |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 2:9:0 | 2:9:0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (42/80) | 51% (40/78) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (31/42) | 70% (28/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 61% (23/38) | 61% (23/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 17% (1/6) |
Return Points W% | 35% (27/78) | 33% (26/80) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(8) 6-4 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
78)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marsel Ilhan | Naoki Nakagawa |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 55% (6/5) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (13/12) | 40% (4/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (127/118) | 48% (45/48) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.39 |
Aces Total | 10 | 18 |
DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.22 |
DFs Total | 12 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:49 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 112.75 |
1st Serve % | 57% (265/468) | 52% (154/295) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (181/265) | 70% (108/154) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (93/203) | 48% (67/141) |
BPs Won% Total | 58% (22/38) | 39% (11/28) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (196/472) | 37% (110/294) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 50% (1/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (6/11) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Marsel Ilhan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Tobias Smoliner
Player
Marsel Ilhan
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mikhail Korovin
Player
Marsel Ilhan
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Marsel Ilhan
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Marsel Ilhan
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Antonio Caruso
44%
(
29 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Freek Van Donselaar
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-0 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 0-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Gabriel Matuszewski
Player
Marsel Ilhan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
55
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H |
view more
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 5-7 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rigele Te
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andres Martin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more