Marsel Ilhan vs Hanwen Li Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilhan vs Li analysis and find out who is favored!
Marsel Ilhan vs Hanwen Li Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilhan has won 48.95% of points on his second serve, while Li has won 35.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilhan, in recent form, has won 56.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Li has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.08% and 33.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilhan has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Li has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilhan has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 23/ 13), with Li winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilhan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 303/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22). Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 59/ 51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 19/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilhan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12), where as Li has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 20/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilhan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilhan winning 2 and Li winning 0. The last match between Ilhan and Li was at the M15 Antalya, 01-07-2021, Second, Clay with Marsel Ilhan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilhan and Li have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilhan winning 0 times and Li 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilhan winning 0, and Li 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilhan has played against opponents with an average rank of 87.67 while Li has played against players with an average rank of 174.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilhan has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Li has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilhan has converted 53.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Li has converted 55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilhan 1 - 0 Li
23
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
877
Rank
77
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
542
Rank
524
High
21
Age
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
59% (640-447)
Career Total W/L
51% (78-76)
63% (5-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$591,915
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marsel Ilhan | Hanwen Li |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (22/38) | 56% (32/57) |
1st Serve Win% | 82% (18/22) | 56% (18/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 63% (10/16) | 24% (6/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 58% (33/57) | 26% (10/38) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Hanwen Li
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marsel Ilhan | Hanwen Li |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (99/89) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
Aces Total | 5 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.1 | 0 |
DFs Total | 9 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 52% (178/343) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (123/178) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (78/165) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 62% (18/29) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (145/336) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Marsel Ilhan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Marsel Ilhan
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Marsel Ilhan
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Antonio Caruso
44%
(
29 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Freek Van Donselaar
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-0 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 0-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Gabriel Matuszewski
Player
Marsel Ilhan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
55
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Marsel Ilhan
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
90)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(12) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Hanwen Li Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Player
Hanwen Li
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hanwen Li
Player
Thanapet Chanta
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Hanwen Li
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
53)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dane Sweeny
Player
Hanwen Li
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Hanwen Li
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
36%
(
28 of
78)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Hanwen Li
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hanwen Li
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jose Statham
Player
Hanwen Li
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
16
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
23%
(
20 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
18 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zhe Li
Player
Hanwen Li
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
13
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hanwen Li
Player
James McCabe
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more