Marlon Vankan vs Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vankan vs Makhlouf analysis and find out who is favored!
Marlon Vankan vs Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vankan has won 44.92% of points on his second serve, while Makhlouf has won 46.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vankan, in recent form, has won 49.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Makhlouf has won 50.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.61% and 33.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vankan has saved 56.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Makhlouf has saved 50.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vankan has won 58.73% of matches played (W/L 37/ 26), with Makhlouf winning 62.12% (W/L 41/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vankan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 110/ 86), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Makhlouf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 64/ 43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 33/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Vankan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 36/ 24), where as Makhlouf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.12% of matches (W/L 41/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vankan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vankan winning 2 and Makhlouf winning 0. The last match between Vankan and Makhlouf was at the M15 Eupen, 09-08-2022, Q3, Clay with Marlon Vankan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vankan and Makhlouf have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vankan winning 0 times and Makhlouf 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vankan winning 0, and Makhlouf 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vankan has played against opponents with an average rank of 184.33 while Makhlouf has played against players with an average rank of 35.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vankan has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Makhlouf has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vankan has converted 39.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Makhlouf has converted 44.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vankan 1 - 0 Makhlouf
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
558
Rank
558
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (123-109)
Career Total W/L
51% (103-98)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
60% (21-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marlon Vankan | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (37/55) | 50% (23/46) |
1st Serve Win% | 78% (29/37) | 48% (11/23) |
2nd Serve Win% | 28% (5/18) | 39% (9/23) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 57% (26/46) | 38% (21/55) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Marlon Vankan
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marlon Vankan | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 60% (21/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 44% (19/24) | 61% (46/30) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (186/212) | 53% (385/338) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (21/14) |
Clay Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.05 |
Aces Total | 24 | 19 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.06 |
DFs Total | 45 | 20 |
Avg Match Time | 1:59:37 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 161.24 | 37.49 |
1st Serve % | 67% (880/1320) | 62% (481/778) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (550/880) | 60% (287/481) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (198/440) | 44% (132/297) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (52/133) | 38% (33/88) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (493/1250) | 40% (330/820) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 47% (7/8) | 60% (21/14) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (7/16) | 60% (21/35) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 33% (2/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 33% (2/6) |
1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 95% (21/20) |
1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 5% (21/1) |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 7% (14/1) |
Marlon Vankan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Marlon Vankan
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marlon Vankan
Player
Eero Vasa
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marlon Vankan
Player
Artur Kukasian
67%
(
82 of
122)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
56 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Atakan Karahan
Player
Marlon Vankan
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marlon Vankan
Player
Lewie Lane
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Louis Tessa
Player
Marlon Vankan
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marlon Vankan
Player
Atakan Karahan
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Marlon Vankan
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marlon Vankan
Player
Louroi Martinez
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Marlon Vankan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Andrea Bolla
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Peter Buldorini
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luca Giacomini
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more