C. Smith
To Win
E. Nava
To Win
Marko Topo vs Emilio Nava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W W L L
Form
L W L W W L W L W WHead To Head: Topo 1 - 0 Nava
They have played 3 sets in total, with Topo winning 2 and Nava winning 1. The last match between Topo and Nava was at the Hamburg Open - Hamburg, 17-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Marko Topo getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marko Topo | 1 |
| Emilio Nava | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Hamburg Open - Hamburg(17-05-2025)
Marko Topo
Emilio Nava
6
3
3
6
6
2
| Topo | Stats | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (27-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (38-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 276 | Ranking | 121 |
| 276 | Highest Rank | 119 |
| 21 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 6 |
| 56% (125-97) | Career Total W/L | 60% (226-153) |
| $34,195 | Career Prize Money | $559,385 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
19 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fearnley VS Moutet PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Marko Topo
Player
Emilio Nava
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:51:29 | Average Match Time | 1:51:29 |
| 68% (53/78) | 1st Serve % | 70% (55/79) |
| 70% (37/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (34/55) |
| 60% (15/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (14/24) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 39% (31/79) | Return Points Win % | 33% (26/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Topo vs Nava Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance indicates Nava has an advantage, winning 46.64% of points compared to Topo's 42.13%. Could this edge determine the match outcome?
- In returning second serves, Nava again bests Topo, seizing 47.27% of points relative to Topo's 44.17%.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Topo has a slight lead with 27.89%, while Nava trails with 25.04%.
- Topo shows strength under pressure by saving 61.57% of breakpoints, outpacing Nava's 53.11% save rate.
- Both players have a similar win percentage over the past year, with Topo at 60.29% and Nava at 59.49%, indicating a closely matched contest.
- Analyzing surface preferences, Topo excels on Hard courts (66%), whereas Nava performs best on Clay (68%).
- Topo predominantly competes in lower-level tournaments, winning 70.59%. Nava, in contrast, has faced tougher competition in higher-level tournaments and achieved a 65.71% win rate.
- Nava has battled stronger opponents, with an average ranking of 266.54, compared to Topo's 432.04, suggesting a potentially better preparation for high-level play.
- In tight situations, Nava is more successful in deciding sets, claiming victory 52% of the time versus Topo's 39%.
- Breakpoint conversion is more effective with Nava, who converts 37.63% of opportunities, surpassing Topo's 35.16% rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 16, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match presents an intriguing face-off between two players with distinct strengths. Nava demonstrates a consistent edge in second serve and return performance, which could be pivotal in determining the match outcome.
Topo, however, brings commendable composure under pressure, reflected in their higher breakpoint save percentage. Their proficiency on hard courts could also be a decisive factor if the surface is advantageous.
Nava has contended with tougher opponents over the past year, equipping them with potentially valuable experience. Furthermore, their superior deciding set win rate suggests resilience in clutch moments.
While each player has areas of strength, the comparison slightly leans towards Nava due to their performance trends and ability to handle pressure effectively. Therefore, Nava is the likely favorite to win this forthcoming match.
Topo vs Nava Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Marko Topo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Marko Topo
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Marko Topo
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Facundo Mena
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Norbert Gombos
57%
(
59 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
61 of
80)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Andrew Paulson
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Facundo Mena
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
9
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Marko Topo
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Ryan Peniston
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jack Pinnington Jones
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
121)
26
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
84%
(
66 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
28%
(
31 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
44 of
121)
125
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-7(10) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Emilio Nava
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Andrej Martin
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
7
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Emilio Nava
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
102)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
29 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (125/97) | Win/Loss | 60% (226/153) |
| 56% (283/224) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (502/389) |
| 52% (2492/2285) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4514/4191) |
| 66% (29/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (89/73) |
| 58% (89/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (105/52) |
| 29% (7/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.52 |
| 779 | Aces Total | 2236 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 611 | Total Double Faults | 1071 |
| 1:35:1 | Average Match Time | 1:36:50 |
| 418.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.03 |
| 59% (8593/14545) | 1st Serve % | 63% (16428/26216) |
| 70% (5990/8593) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11656/16428) |
| 49% (2941/5952) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5032/9788) |
| 41% (617/1498) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (974/2330) |
| 40% (5725/14314) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9936/26271) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 54% (13/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 44% (7/9) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 50% (50/50) | Challenger W/L | 62% (148/91) |
| 64% (68/38) | Futures W/L | 65% (48/26) |
| 57% (121/213) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (220/368) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 54% (37/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (77/162) |
| 48% (33/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (75/123) |
| 80% (134/107) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (211/183) |
| 19% (134/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (211/28) |
| 19% (88/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (168/42) |
Topo vs. Nava Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
