Mark Philippoussis vs Amer Delic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W L L L
Form
L W W L L W L L L LHead-2-Head: Philippoussis 1 - 0 Delic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Philippoussis winning 2 and Delic winning 1. The last match between Philippoussis and Delic was at the The $50,000 Pro Challenger at Calabasas - Calabasas, 22-10-2006, Final, Hard with Mark Philippoussis getting the victory 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | 1 |
| Amer Delic | 0 |
The $50,000 Pro Challenger at Calabasas - Calabasas(22-10-2006)
6
7
7
6
6
3
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
1
Head-to-Head
0
Ret.
Ranking
Ret.
9
Highest Rank
60
48
Age
42
R
Plays
R
12
Titles
7
60% (319-211)
Career Total W/L
55% (272-221)
$154,660
Career Prize Money
$300,634
0
YTD Titles
0
1
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
23 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Paul PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
23 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Philippoussis VS Delic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 | |||||
Philippoussis VS Delic H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
19
Games Won
16
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mark Philippoussis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Eric Quigley
Player
Mark Philippoussis
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
10
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
14
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
36 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(1) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Yani
Player
Mark Philippoussis
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Robin | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Robin | 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 2-6 2-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| F | 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Amer Delic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Fitzpatrick
Player
Amer Delic
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
31
Total Points Won
37
|
2-6 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Amer Delic
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
14
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Amer Delic
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Amer Delic
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amer Delic
Player
James Lemke
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Kuznetsov
Player
Amer Delic
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Catalin-Ionut Gard
Player
Amer Delic
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Amer Delic
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amer Delic
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 7-6(16) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
60% (319/211)
Win/Loss
55% (272/221)
57% (809/618)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (655/555)
52% (7480/6958)
Games Win/Loss
51% (6242/6026)
60% (143/97)
Hard Win/Loss
55% (148/120)
53% (43/38)
Clay Win/Loss
50% (40/40)
62% (82/51)
Indoor Hard W/L
64% (72/41)
67% (51/25)
Grass Win/Loss
38% (12/20)
0.11
Aces Per Game
0.23
777
Aces Total
1407
0.04
Double Faults Per Game
0.07
282
Total Double Faults
403
1st Match
Average Match Time
1st Match
389.41
Average Opponent Rank
585.3
58% (2523/4315)
1st Serve %
62% (7966/12795)
80% (2001/2503)
1st Serve Win %
72% (5784/7984)
50% (880/1773)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (2496/4830)
33% (116/354)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (359/945)
35% (1501/4347)
Return Points Win %
35% (4428/12723)
64% (69/38)
Slam W/L
46% (23/27)
54% (75/64)
Masters W/L
56% (18/14)
48% (11/12)
Cups W/L
73% (8/3)
63% (148/87)
Main Tour W/L
43% (46/61)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
65% (11/6)
Challenger W/L
60% (169/113)
0% (0/0)
Futures W/L
73% (8/3)
60% (241/400)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (256/459)
62% (78/126)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
48% (15/31)
53% (171/320)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (156/288)
59% (106/180)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (94/180)
86% (289/249)
1st Set Won, Won Match
82% (273/225)
13% (289/37)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (273/46)
29% (241/69)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (220/47)
See recent tennis photos of Philippoussis and Delic
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
