Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marius Copil vs Gerald Melzer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Copil vs Melzer analysis and find out who is favored!
Marius Copil vs Gerald Melzer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Copil has won 51.55% of points on his second serve, while Melzer has won 53.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Copil, in recent form, has won 47.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Melzer has won 52.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.34% and 36.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Copil has saved 57.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Melzer has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Copil has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 27/ 24), with Melzer winning 63.16% (W/L 24/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Copil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 167/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 149/ 165). Melzer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 394/ 244), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 4/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Copil has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 24/ 21), where as Melzer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Copil winning 3 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Copil winning 6 and Melzer winning 2. The last match between Copil and Melzer was at the Timisoara Challenger, 03-07-2013, First, Clay with Marius Copil getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Copil and Melzer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Copil winning 2 times and Melzer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Copil winning 2, and Melzer 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Copil has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.51 while Melzer has played against players with an average rank of 234.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Copil has won 73% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Melzer has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Copil has converted 36.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Melzer has converted 45.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Copil 3 - 0 Melzer
360
Rank
56
High
33
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
563
Rank
68
High
33
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
54% (506-426)
Career Total W/L
59% (435-300)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
69% (9-4)
$1,305,320
Career Prize Money
$199,225
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marius Copil | Gerald Melzer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
| Games Won | 48 | 35 |
| Aces (Total) | 27 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:3 | 1:18:3 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (98/162) | 63% (116/183) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 87% (85/98) | 72% (83/116) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (36/64) | 57% (38/67) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 23% (3/13) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (62/183) | 25% (41/162) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-7(2) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Marius Copil
Player
Gerald Melzer
55%
(
62 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
66 of
115)
17
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
85%
(
53 of
62)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
51 of
66)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
32 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
35 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Gerald Melzer
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marius Copil | Gerald Melzer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 69% (9/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) | 65% (20/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (192/200) | 56% (158/125) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.69 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 132 | 34 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:11 | 1:50:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 282.35 | 218.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (649/1112) | 61% (547/895) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (495/649) | 68% (374/547) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (235/463) | 53% (185/348) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (33/94) | 46% (49/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (431/1202) | 43% (417/970) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 75% (6/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 69% (9/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 40% (5/2) |
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Altug Celikbilek
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gerald Melzer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
80 of
114)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
60 of
77)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
43 of
128)
117
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(8) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Alexander Frusina
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Gerald Melzer
57%
(
66 of
115)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Mathys Erhard
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Gerald Melzer
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Jorge Martinez Martinez
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Copil Vs Melzer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
