Mario Vilella Martinez vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martinez vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Mario Vilella Martinez vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martinez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nakashima has won 56.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martinez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 49.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martinez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 71.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martinez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nakashima winning 58.67% (W/L 44/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martinez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 262/ 144), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Martinez winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Martinez winning 0 and Nakashima winning 2. The last match between Martinez and Nakashima was at the Nottingham 1 Challenger, 08-06-2021, First, Grass with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Martinez and Nakashima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Martinez winning 0 times and Nakashima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Martinez winning 0, and Nakashima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martinez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 233.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martinez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martinez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 35.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Martinez 0 - 1 Nakashima
11
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
883
Rank
158
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
87
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
2
Minor
Form
61% (307-196)
Career Total W/L
61% (184-116)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
72% (26-10)
$297,990
Career Prize Money
$1,608,265
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mario Vilella Martinez | Brandon Nakashima |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 5 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 12 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:53:21 | 0:53:21 |
1st Serve % | 67% (38/57) | 69% (27/39) |
1st Serve Win% | 58% (22/38) | 85% (23/27) |
2nd Serve Win% | 42% (8/19) | 75% (9/12) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
Return Points W% | 18% (7/39) | 47% (27/57) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mario Vilella Martinez
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
7
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mario Vilella Martinez | Brandon Nakashima |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 72% (26/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (54/25) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (439/362) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.71 |
Aces Total | 0 | 278 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 0 | 50 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 294.19 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (1625/2494) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (1222/1625) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (498/869) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 34% (73/217) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (976/2634) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (19/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (25/35) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/17) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (25/22) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 12% (25/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Mario Vilella Martinez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Mario Vilella Martinez
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Altug Celikbilek
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
5
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
7
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Mario Vilella Martinez
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Mario Vilella Martinez
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Mario Vilella Martinez
67%
(
77 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Elias Ymer
Player
Mario Vilella Martinez
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Dudi Sela
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nuno Borges
Player
Mario Vilella Martinez
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Mario Vilella Martinez
42%
(
27 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
16
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more