Mario Ancic vs Julien Benneteau Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L W L L L
Form
W L L W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Ancic 3 - 0 Benneteau
They have played 10 sets in total, with Ancic winning 7 and Benneteau winning 3. The last match between Ancic and Benneteau was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 13-03-2010, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Mario Ancic getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | 3 |
| Julien Benneteau | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(13-03-2010)
Mario Ancic
Julien Benneteau
4
6
7
6
6
3
| Ancic | Stats | Benneteau |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 7 | Highest Rank | 25 |
| 41 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 4 |
| 62% (302-188) | Career Total W/L | 55% (518-427) |
| $1,915,135 | Career Prize Money | $3,991,045 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cirstea VS Gracheva PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Goffin PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Mario Ancic
Player
Julien Benneteau
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
55 of
87)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
124)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Mario Ancic
Player
Julien Benneteau
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
82%
(
42 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(8) 6-2 5-7 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 57 | Games Won | 44 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 62% (85/138) | 1st Serve % | 74% (129/175) |
| 75% (64/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (77/129) |
| 45% (24/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (17/46) |
| 37% (11/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 46% (81/175) | Return Points Win % | 36% (50/138) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mario Ancic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Koellerer
Player
Mario Ancic
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivo Minar
Player
Mario Ancic
50%
(
66 of
131)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
51%
(
33 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
109
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Mario Ancic
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
9
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Mario Ancic
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mario Ancic
Player
Julien Benneteau
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
55 of
87)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
124)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Ancic
Player
Bobby Reynolds
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
12
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Julien Benneteau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Julien Benneteau
48%
(
42 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
12
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julien Benneteau
Player
Corentin Moutet
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julien Benneteau
Player
Mats Moraing
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
6
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
8
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Julien Benneteau
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
14
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien Benneteau
Player
Ivan Nedelko
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Julien Benneteau
51%
(
75 of
147)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
122)
22
Aces
12
15
Double Faults
15
83%
(
62 of
75)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
46%
(
33 of
72)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
52 of
147)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
122)
144
Total Points Won
125
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julien Benneteau
Player
Marco Cecchinato
52%
(
80 of
154)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
24
Aces
23
9
Double Faults
8
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
50%
(
37 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
36%
(
56 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
46 of
128)
144
Total Points Won
138
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Julien Benneteau
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
39%
(
31 of
80)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (302/188) | Win/Loss | 55% (518/427) |
| 58% (718/519) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1259/1110) |
| 53% (6477/5734) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11625/11295) |
| 60% (116/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (160/148) |
| 53% (42/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (122/117) |
| 64% (98/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (193/120) |
| 73% (46/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 51% (43/42) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1616 | Aces Total | 3906 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 425 | Total Double Faults | 2079 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 30.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 519.24 |
| 62% (8673/14043) | 1st Serve % | 64% (31959/49766) |
| 76% (6565/8673) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (22378/31900) |
| 52% (2769/5376) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8768/17784) |
| 39% (503/1288) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1797/4527) |
| 37% (5414/14478) | Return Points Win % | 37% (18748/50043) |
| 68% (48/23) | Slam W/L | 50% (65/65) |
| 50% (41/41) | Masters W/L | 52% (101/93) |
| 48% (12/13) | Cups W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 65% (127/69) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (212/174) |
| 64% (69/39) | Challenger W/L | 60% (136/90) |
| 71% (5/2) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (252/408) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (463/826) |
| 62% (49/79) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (49/109) |
| 52% (121/231) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (187/360) |
| 64% (93/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (166/318) |
| 90% (283/255) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (505/411) |
| 10% (283/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (505/94) |
| 22% (206/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (438/104) |
Ancic vs. Benneteau Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
