Marine Partaud vs Jacquline NYLANDER Altelius Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Partaud vs Altelius analysis and find out who is favored!
Marine Partaud vs Jacquline NYLANDER Altelius Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Partaud has won 40.1% of points on his second serve, while Altelius has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Partaud, in recent form, has won 53.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Altelius has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.66% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Partaud has saved 54.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Altelius has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Partaud has won 44.74% of matches played (W/L 17/ 21), with Altelius winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Partaud has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 238/ 180), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 22/ 31). Altelius has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Partaud has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.74% of matches (W/L 17/ 21), where as Altelius has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Partaud has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.18 while Altelius has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Partaud has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Altelius has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Partaud has converted 33.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Altelius has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Partaud 0 - 0 Altelius
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marine Partaud | Jacquline NYLANDER Altelius |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 43% (3/4) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (68/72) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.04 | N/A |
Aces Total | 3 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.21 | N/A |
DFs Total | 14 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:15:51 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 79.57 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 66% (212/319) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 49% (104/212) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (49/107) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (14/43) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 42% (142/339) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | N/A |
Marine Partaud Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Marine Partaud
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
83%
(
55 of
66)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Madison Sieg
Player
Marine Partaud
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marine Partaud
Player
Ashton Bowers
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
14
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
49%
(
50 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Marine Partaud
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Allura Zamarripa
Player
Marine Partaud
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Marine Partaud
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
0
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Katarina Jokic
Player
Marine Partaud
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marine Partaud
Player
Nadia Lagaev
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
85%
(
51 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Jacquline NYLANDER Altelius Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Nina Vargova
Player
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Klaudija Bubelyte
Player
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-6 | H2H |
view more