S. Mochizuki
To Win
M. Cilic
To Win
Marin Cilic vs Marco Trungelliti Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W W W W
Form
W W W L W W W W W LHead To Head: Cilic 1 - 1 Trungelliti
They have played 7 sets in total, with Cilic winning 3 and Trungelliti winning 4. The last match between Cilic and Trungelliti was at the Madrid Challenger, 10-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Marin Cilic getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | 1 |
| Marco Trungelliti | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Madrid Challenger(10-04-2025)
Marin Cilic
Marco Trungelliti
6
2
4
6
6
1
| Cilic | Stats | Trungelliti |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (18-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (20-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 101 | Ranking | 154 |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 112 |
| 36 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 26 | Titles | 13 |
| 64% (701-389) | Career Total W/L | 59% (575-406) |
| $22,938,060 | Career Prize Money | $1,121,053 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
21 Jun 2025 / Final
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sonmez VS Eala PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne wta
21 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kovacevic VS Wayenburg PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
21 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cilic VS Trungelliti H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Marin Cilic
Player
Marco Trungelliti
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Marin Cilic
65%
(
87 of
134)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
110)
4
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
53 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
122
Total Points Won
122
|
||||
Cilic VS Trungelliti H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 34 | Games Won | 31 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:32:43 | Average Match Time | 2:32:43 |
| 56% (104/187) | 1st Serve % | 60% (133/220) |
| 75% (78/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (85/133) |
| 54% (45/83) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (45/87) |
| 36% (9/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
| 41% (90/220) | Return Points Win % | 34% (64/187) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cilic vs Trungelliti Match Preview :
When it comes to second serve performance in recent months, both Trungelliti and Cilic show nearly equal prowess. Trungelliti has managed to secure 46.64% of points on their second serve, while Cilic comes in slightly ahead with 46.92%. This subtle difference might seem negligible but could be pivotal in predicting the match's outcome. How crucial is second serve performance in determining a match winner? Remarkably so, as it holds significant weight in match prediction accuracy.
Shifting focus to return game statistics, Trungelliti appears to have a slight edge. In recent form, he has won 47.47% of his opponent's second serve points. Although Cilic trails closely with 46.14% on the same metric, the gap widens with first serve returns, where Trungelliti achieves 28.93% compared to Cilic’s 25.42%. Could these stats tip the scale in Trungelliti's favor for their head-to-head matchup?
Under pressure, the ability to save breakpoints becomes critical. Cilic boasts a higher rate, saving 56.78% of the time, compared to Trungelliti's 51.43%. This strength could be vital in high-stakes moments and suggest Cilic’s resilience in pivotal games. Moreover, the overall performance over the past year shows Trungelliti winning 53.23% of his matches, while Cilic triumphs in 60.71% of his. This suggests a slight overall advantage for Cilic when evaluating their recent form.
Surface preference can play a decisive role in tennis. Trungelliti excels on clay, boasting a 61% win rate, yet he struggles on indoor hard courts with only 38%. Cilic's best surface is grass, where he commands a 72% win rate, but his performance on hard courts, though his worst, is still a solid 63%. The surface could be a deciding factor, but both players have strengths in areas where the other may falter.
Direct head-to-head statistics often provide clear insights into player rivalry. They've faced each other only once before, with Trungelliti claiming victory. The match was held on clay at the French Open in 2016, a surface Trungelliti favors, and he emerged victorious 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 6-2. The historical head-to-head might suggest Trungelliti's mental edge, but the opponent quality stats offer another layer. Trungelliti's average opponent rank over the past year has been 254.39, while Cilic has been tested against players with an average rank of 142.04, indicating a higher level of competition faced by Cilic.
In matches that stretch to deciding sets, Trungelliti has won half of these contests lately, whereas Cilic triumphs in 67% of such situations. Past performances in extreme pressure scenarios reflect that Trungelliti won the sole tiebreak played against Cilic. Combined with his higher breakpoint conversion rate of 32.26% against Cilic's 23.81%, Trungelliti appears better positioned to capitalize on key moments.
Given the statistics, Trungelliti might seem like the favorite based on direct head-to-head performance and specific strengths, particularly in returns and conversions during pressure points. However, Cilic’s competitive experience against tougher opponents and overall match win rate cannot be discounted. While these figures paint an interesting picture, the anticipated clash promises a dynamic encounter that could swing either way based on the unfolding match conditions.
Cilic vs Trungelliti Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Marin Cilic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
124)
30
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
89%
(
55 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
62 of
84)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
44 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Lloyd Harris
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
8
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
36 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
67
|
2-6 6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Marin Cilic
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
14
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Paul Jubb
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Marin Cilic
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Marin Cilic
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marco Trungelliti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Marco Trungelliti
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
15
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
54 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
5
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Ivan Gakhov
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
36%
(
35 of
97)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Marco Trungelliti
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (701/389) | Win/Loss | 59% (575/406) |
| 61% (1749/1130) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1294/1046) |
| 54% (15172/13151) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11607/10886) |
| 63% (251/147) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (93/78) |
| 62% (192/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (459/289) |
| 65% (168/92) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (15/26) |
| 73% (90/34) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (8/13) |
| 0.64 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 8914 | Aces Total | 2597 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2905 | Total Double Faults | 2479 |
| 1:17:55 | Average Match Time | 1:18:34 |
| 446.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 526.42 |
| 57% (43550/76665) | 1st Serve % | 57% (31579/55120) |
| 77% (33615/43712) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (21419/31579) |
| 52% (17381/33201) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (11622/23541) |
| 39% (2763/7146) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2414/5686) |
| 38% (29906/79263) | Return Points Win % | 41% (22225/54504) |
| 70% (147/62) | Slam W/L | 55% (51/42) |
| 53% (130/117) | Masters W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 67% (36/18) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (305/140) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (53/49) |
| 17% (2/10) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (51/29) | Challenger W/L | 57% (318/239) |
| 74% (25/9) | Futures W/L | 68% (146/69) |
| 62% (532/853) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (556/946) |
| 70% (162/230) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (10/18) |
| 52% (265/512) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (171/328) |
| 58% (214/367) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (226/368) |
| 85% (674/576) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (508/438) |
| 14% (674/97) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (508/70) |
| 30% (416/123) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (473/137) |
Cilic vs. Trungelliti Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
