M. Navone
To Win
B. Nakashima
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L LForm
L L W W L L L W L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Navone winning 2 and Tien winning 0. The last match between Navone and Tien was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 07-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Mariano Navone getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Mariano Navone | 1 |
Learner Tien | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(07-03-2025)
Navone | Stats | Tien |
---|---|---|
48% (15-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (14-12) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
98 | Ranking | 67 |
29 | Highest Rank | 66 |
24 | Age | 19 |
- | Plays | - |
6 | Titles | 10 |
61% (238-150) | Career Total W/L | 72% (119-47) |
$817,745 | Career Prize Money | $482,330 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 9 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:55:25 | Average Match Time | 1:55:25 |
66% (42/64) | 1st Serve % | 56% (49/87) |
74% (31/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (30/49) |
55% (12/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (20/38) |
43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
43% (37/87) | Return Points Win % | 33% (21/64) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Let's dive into the wonderful world of tennis statistics, where numbers bounce around like a rogue tennis ball in a windy open court! Hold onto your rackets, folks, because here comes Tien with a second serve success rate of 41.25%. Not too shabby, until we realize Navone's been puffing up his second serve points with a slightly superior 49.75%. It seems Navone prefers the more methodical ‘let’s take a bit more time to serve’ approach, while Tien might be whispering, “Let’s just get this done!” under his breath.
When it comes to grabbing those cheeky points off opponents' second serves, Tien's been leaving no string loose on his racquet with a 49.83% success rate. Navone, meanwhile, has been composing a symphony of missed opportunities at 45.74%. Perhaps Navone has been dining on a bit too much clay at the buffet, feeling more at home getting his shoes dirty. On the first-serve returns though, things are quite the topsy-turvy show, with Navone leading ever so slightly by a sprinkle over Tien—29.66% to 28.33%. Who knew tennis could be so nail-biting without a single ball bouncing!
When those pressure moments roll in faster than your Aunt Edna at a sale, Tien's been brushing off breakpoints like lint from his tennis shorts, saving 54.45%. Navone, although adept at breakpoint prevention with 54.27%, might want to reconsider adding more yoga to his routine. Mental flexibility is always a plus, especially on clay courts! The twist here is that Tien’s been on a match-fix-a-thon party, celebrating wins 83.75% of the time over the past year. On the contrary, Navone might want to consider opening a ‘Match Wins Wanted’ charity with a win rate of just 45.28%.
Now let’s prance around surfaces: Tien’s a hard court virtuoso with a 77% win rate, but he might be doing jazz hands when it comes to clay, only serving up a 43% win rate on beautiful wet dirt. Conversely, Navone seems to be a clay connoisseur with a dashing 65% victory dance, though the grass has been less inviting, as he’s won a grand total of zero matches there. Yet, both players have chosen their respective ladders to fame—Tien rockin' the Challenger/ITF circuit with an 81.58% success rate, whereas Navone’s tasted the glittery Main tour, albeit with his wins just a tad shy at 48.39%.
The tale gets juicier when opponents join the party. Tien's often been the King of the underdog court, squaring off against an average rank of 290.27, but Navone’s been rubbing shoulders with the ranking elite at an average rank of 80.11. If this match ticks into a deciding spree, Tien could well be the Cinderella with an impressive 81% deciding set win rate. Navone, on the other hand, might need a little more luck, winning just 40% of those nail-biters. And should any breakpoint opportunities arise, watch out—Tien’s got a conversion chance charm that's working at 33.8%, while Navone’s polishing his conversion wand at 30.37%.
So, wrap it up with all this stats juggling and mathematical wizardry—my magic crystal ball of stats is keeping its shiny eye on Tien for the victorious finish. Watch out, world, here comes a statistical quiet storm! 🎾
Navone vs Tien Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kei Nishikori
Player
Learner Tien
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Reilly Opelka
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gastao Elias
Player
Learner Tien
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marcos Giron
Player
Learner Tien
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
96)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (238/150) | Win/Loss | 72% (119/47) |
59% (540/379) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (263/144) |
53% (4660/4053) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2114/1717) |
33% (8/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 76% (92/29) |
65% (228/125) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) |
29% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 72% (21/8) |
0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
375 | Aces Total | 484 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
968 | Total Double Faults | 485 |
1:40:29 | Average Match Time | 1:42:9 |
235.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 327.09 |
66% (15684/23693) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7536/12043) |
62% (9747/15684) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5075/7536) |
48% (3874/8009) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2327/4507) |
47% (1409/3007) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (610/1302) |
45% (11049/24376) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5065/11971) |
20% (2/8) | Slam W/L | 60% (6/4) |
35% (6/11) | Masters W/L | 14% (1/6) |
50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
53% (25/22) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (15/9) |
66% (77/40) | Challenger W/L | 75% (39/13) |
65% (126/67) | Futures W/L | 79% (58/15) |
61% (232/378) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 73% (111/152) |
50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) |
54% (52/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (40/65) |
53% (71/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 71% (39/55) |
84% (233/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (105/98) |
16% (233/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (105/7) |
27% (155/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 34% (61/21) |