G. M. Perricard
To Win
C. Norrie
To Win
Mariano Navone vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W W L W L
Form
W W W W L W L W L LH2H: Navone 1 - 1 Perricard
They have played 5 sets in total, with Navone winning 3 and Perricard winning 2. The last match between Navone and Perricard was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 23-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Mariano Navone getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mariano Navone | 1 |
| Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(23-04-2025)
Mariano Navone
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
6
4
6
4
| Navone | Stats | Perricard |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (18-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (13-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 91 | Ranking | 36 |
| 29 | Highest Rank | 29 |
| 24 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 8 |
| 61% (241-152) | Career Total W/L | 56% (159-123) |
| $985,745 | Career Prize Money | $1,251,485 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Moutet VS Altmaier PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
McCabe VS Burruchaga PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Mariano Navone
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 1-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Mariano Navone
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 23 | Games Won | 21 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:39:59 | Average Match Time | 1:39:59 |
| 67% (96/143) | 1st Serve % | 64% (87/136) |
| 74% (71/96) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (65/87) |
| 49% (23/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (18/49) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (4/16) |
| 39% (53/136) | Return Points Win % | 34% (49/143) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Navone vs Perricard Match Preview :
Here we are, folks, at the ultimate showdown! On one side, we have Perricard, whose solid recent form has seen them win a whopping 57.79% of points on their second serve over the last six months. Navone, however, isn’t basking in the same glory, managing only 48.66%—which, as we all know, can make or break match predictions. So, when it comes to second serve stats, Perricard’s pretty much serving up a storm while Navone’s second serve is still searching for the right mix!
Let’s dive into the return game. Remember Perricard's prowess on their second serve? Well, they're not so fond of returning them, only grabbing 35.11% of their opponent’s second serve points. Navone, on the other hand, seems to have a master's degree in this department, clinching 46.33%! And let's not ignore those pesky first serve returns—with Perricard at 15.08% and Navone outperforming them at 31.38%, perhaps Perricard could use a return game crash course.
When the chips are down, Perricard is cooler than a cucumber, saving 71.59% of breakpoints, while Navone gets flustered and only saves 50.96% of them. This tidbit is great if you’re placing bets during matches and wondering who handles pressure best! As for their overall win/loss record, in the past year, Perricard has triumphantly marched through 56.6% of their matches. Unfortunately, Navone has only managed to capture 40.74% of victories—it's been a bit of a bumpy ride!
Surface preferences? This is where things get interesting. Perricard dances like a champion on the grass courts, where they’ve won 71% of their matches. Navone prefers the slippery clay, winning 65% of matches there. Grass courts and Navone, however, are not on speaking terms, seeing as they have a win rate of exactly 0% on that surface—a true grass-novice!
They say the first cut is the deepest, and in their sole previous encounter, Perricard sliced through Navone’s defenses at Lima 2 Challenger in an intense three-set marathon. The scoreboard read 1-6, 6-2, 6-3. Perricard was victorious! With an average match time of nearly two hours, the action just doesn’t stop. Under pressure, though, neither has managed to break the deadlock in a tiebreak. Fascinatingly, a deciding set showdown always sees Perricard on top, leaving Navone’s comeback dreams dashed.
If past matches reveal anything, it’s that Perricard is less picky about who they’re up against, having faced opponents with an average rank of 110.32, whereas Navone squares off with higher-ranked foes at 71.54—talk about taking on the big dogs! Still, in breaking-point artistry, Navone has outshone Perricard, converting 34.16% of chances, versus Perricard’s meager 9.09%. Point? Don’t count Perricard out too soon!
The writing's on the tennis ball, folks. With Perricard leading in overall victory stats and their flair for the dramatic in deciding sets, it seems destiny has decided they'll come out on top in this scintillating encounter! Navone might want to update their resume before this whirlwind match begins—as performance predictions stack mighty heavily by Perricard's side. Buckle up for a smashing victory!
Navone vs Perricard Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mariano Navone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Mariano Navone
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Sebastian Ofner
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(6) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Mariano Navone
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
98 of
132)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
64 of
132)
134
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Reilly Opelka
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
47 of
99)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
111
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
94 of
138)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
41%
(
56 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
144
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
87 of
119)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
49 of
87)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Mariano Navone
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
127)
13
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
66 of
83)
77%
(
27 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
24 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
37 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(10) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roman Safiullin
71%
(
84 of
119)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
26
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
48 of
57)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
31%
(
37 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
22 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(10) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
75%
(
100 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
0
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
41 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
108)
125
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Zizou Bergs
61%
(
78 of
127)
1st Serve %
57%
(
78 of
138)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
50 of
138)
136
Total Points Won
129
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Alexander Bublik
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
26
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
1
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
31%
(
37 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (241/152) | Win/Loss | 56% (159/123) |
| 59% (549/386) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (362/315) |
| 53% (4736/4125) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3586/3483) |
| 33% (8/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) |
| 65% (230/126) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (75/56) |
| 29% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (25/28) |
| 17% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.95 |
| 390 | Aces Total | 3294 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 979 | Total Double Faults | 1035 |
| 1:41:7 | Average Match Time | 1:39:52 |
| 310.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 331.03 |
| 66% (16018/24189) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13234/21194) |
| 62% (9960/16018) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (10261/13234) |
| 48% (3951/8171) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (4196/7965) |
| 47% (1431/3055) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (452/1297) |
| 45% (11253/24857) | Return Points Win % | 32% (6669/20932) |
| 31% (4/9) | Slam W/L | 45% (9/11) |
| 35% (6/11) | Masters W/L | 15% (2/11) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 53% (26/23) | Main Tour W/L | 67% (28/14) |
| 66% (77/40) | Challenger W/L | 62% (78/48) |
| 65% (126/67) | Futures W/L | 51% (41/39) |
| 61% (232/379) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (154/268) |
| 58% (7/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 55% (55/100) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (112/187) |
| 53% (71/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (61/96) |
| 83% (236/197) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (150/128) |
| 17% (236/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (150/21) |
| 27% (157/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (132/31) |
Navone vs. Perricard Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
