Prediction of Mariana Diaz Oliva vs Nannie De Villiers Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Diaz Oliva vs N. De Villiers

Mariana Diaz Oliva

ARG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

120

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Nannie De Villiers

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

120

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Oliva 1 - 0 Villiers

They have played 3 sets in total, with Mariana Diaz Oliva winning 2 and Nannie De Villiers winning 1. The last match between Mariana Diaz Oliva and Nannie De Villiers was at the ITF Sao Paulo 1, 06-11-1995, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Mariana Diaz Oliva getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Oliva	1
Villiers	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Sao Paulo 1(11-06-95)

Stats

Mariana Diaz Oliva

Nannie De Villiers

M. D. Oliva vs N. D. Villiers H2H Profile

M. D. Oliva	Stats	N. D. Villiers
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
75.76% (125-40)	Career Total W/L	57.14% (40-30)
1	Clay	0
9	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. D. Oliva vs N. D. Villiers Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mariana Diaz Oliva has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nannie De Villiers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mariana Diaz Oliva, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nannie De Villiers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mariana Diaz Oliva has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nannie De Villiers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mariana Diaz Oliva has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nannie De Villiers winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mariana Diaz Oliva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 77% (W/L 122/36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/4). Nannie De Villiers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 77% (W/L 25/14), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 15/14).
Player level: In the last year, Mariana Diaz Oliva has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nannie De Villiers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mariana Diaz Oliva winning 1 times and Nannie De Villiers being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mariana Diaz Oliva winning 2 and Nannie De Villiers winning 1.
The last match between Mariana Diaz Oliva and Nannie De Villiers was at the ITF Sao Paulo 1, 06-11-1995, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Mariana Diaz Oliva getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mariana Diaz Oliva has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nannie De Villiers has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mariana Diaz Oliva has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nannie De Villiers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mariana Diaz Oliva has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nannie De Villiers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mariana Diaz Oliva vs Nannie De Villiers Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. D. Oliva vs N. D. Villiers H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. D. Oliva	Stats	N. D. Villiers
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	13
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

M. D. Oliva Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sao Paulo 25K - 04-11-1996
F Andrea VieiraA. Vieira	W	7-5 6-3	Stats
Luciana TellaL. Tella	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
SF Cara BlackC. Black	W	7-6 7-6	Stats
R3 Ludmila CervanovaL. Cervanova	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
R4 Eugenia MaiaE. Maia	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

N. D. Villiers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Tucuman - 11-12-1995
R3 Joelle SchadJ. Schad	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
ITF Sao Paulo 4 - 04-12-1995
R3 Marilia FritelliM. Fritelli	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R4 Martina NejedlyM. Nejedly	L	6-1 3-6 6-3	Stats
ITF Sao Paulo 3 - 27-11-1995
R3 Andreea PetrisorA. Petrisor	L	7-6(7) 6-4	Stats
ITF Sao Paulo 2 - 20-11-1995
R3 Andreea PetrisorA. Petrisor	L	2-6 6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

M. D. Oliva vs N. D. Villiers Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. D. Oliva	Stats	N. D. Villiers
75.76% (125/40)	YTD Win/Loss	57.14% (40/30)
70.21% (264/112)	Sets Win/Loss	57.69% (90/66)
58.92% (1951/1360)	Games Win/Loss	52.75% (758/679)
42.86% (3/4)	Hard Win/Loss	51.72% (15/14)
77.22% (122/36)	Clay Win/Loss	64.10% (25/14)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
461.62	Average Opponent Rank	529.24
82.73% (91/19)	Challenger W/L	57.14% (40/30)
76% (125/165)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (40/68)
58% (7/12)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (12/21)
70% (32/46)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (9/18)
94% (114/107)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (42/36)
6% (114/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (42/5)
35% (51/18)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (27/4)