Mariam Atia vs Madelief Hageman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Atia vs Hageman analysis and find out who is favored!
Mariam Atia vs Madelief Hageman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Atia has won 43.4% of points on his second serve, while Hageman has won 42.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Atia, in recent form, has won 51.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hageman has won 56.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.59% and 41.98% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Atia has saved 39.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hageman has saved 46.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Atia has won 50% of matches played (W/L 14/ 14), with Hageman winning 47.62% (W/L 30/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Atia has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 8/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17). Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 83/ 80), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Atia has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 9/ 11), where as Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.79% of matches (W/L 29/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Atia winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Atia winning 2 and Hageman winning 0. The last match between Atia and Hageman was at the W15 Cairo, 05-01-2022, First, Clay with Mariam Atia getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Atia and Hageman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Atia winning 0 times and Hageman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Atia winning 0, and Hageman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Atia has played against opponents with an average rank of 69.54 while Hageman has played against players with an average rank of 107.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Atia has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hageman has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Atia has converted 54.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hageman has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Atia 1 - 0 Hageman
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (27-24)
Career Total W/L
50% (87-86)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mariam Atia | Madelief Hageman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:0 | 1:45:0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (42/64) | 65% (36/55) |
1st Serve Win% | 57% (24/42) | 39% (14/36) |
2nd Serve Win% | 36% (8/22) | 42% (8/19) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 50% (5/10) |
Return Points W% | 60% (33/55) | 50% (32/64) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
Mariam Atia
Player
Madelief Hageman
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mariam Atia | Madelief Hageman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 57% (12/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 47% (17/19) | 59% (30/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (154/162) | 55% (256/211) |
Hard Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.09 |
Aces Total | 7 | 20 |
DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 21 | 44 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:51 |
Avg Opp Rank | 76.65 | 108.38 |
1st Serve % | 73% (527/725) | 63% (658/1051) |
1st Serve W% | 59% (309/527) | 59% (390/658) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (82/198) | 46% (180/393) |
BPs Won% Total | 56% (36/64) | 46% (67/147) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (285/680) | 47% (509/1076) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 36% (4/7) | 60% (12/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 57% (12/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 33% (3/9) |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 75% (12/9) |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 25% (12/3) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 33% (9/3) |
Mariam Atia Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Elena-Teodora Cadar
Player
Mariam Atia
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mariam Atia
Player
Sonal Patil
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Mariam Atia
Player
Maya Drozd
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mariam Atia
Player
Georgia Kalamaris
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Daria Frayman
Player
Mariam Atia
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mariam Atia
Player
Nicol Benesova
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Mariam Atia
40%
(
18 of
45)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
78%
(
21 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Stefania Bojica
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
58%
(
42 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
75
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 7-6(4) 10-7 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
12
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Katerina Tsygourova
Player
Madelief Hageman
82%
(
91 of
111)
1st Serve %
77%
(
111 of
145)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
51%
(
57 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
75 of
145)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Tamara Kostic
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Madelief Hageman
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tamara Sramkova
Player
Madelief Hageman
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Elisabeth Junge-Ilges
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more