Maria Mateas vs Elaine Chervinsky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mateas vs Chervinsky analysis and find out who is favored!
Maria Mateas vs Elaine Chervinsky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mateas has won 44.94% of points on his second serve, while Chervinsky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mateas, in recent form, has won 57.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chervinsky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mateas has saved 56.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chervinsky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mateas has won 58.57% of matches played (W/L 41/ 29), with Chervinsky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mateas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 85/ 72). Chervinsky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Mateas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 39/ 27), where as Chervinsky has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mateas winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mateas winning 2 and Chervinsky winning 0. The last match between Mateas and Chervinsky was at the W25 Vero Beach, 21-01-2020, First, Clay with Maria Mateas getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mateas and Chervinsky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mateas winning 0 times and Chervinsky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mateas winning 0, and Chervinsky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mateas has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.3 while Chervinsky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mateas has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chervinsky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mateas has converted 53.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chervinsky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mateas 1 - 0 Chervinsky
2
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
275
Rank
265
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (197-158)
Career Total W/L
38% (3-5)
63% (10-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$13,868
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mateas VS Chervinsky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Maria Mateas | Elaine Chervinsky |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (29/44) | 45% (27/60) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (20/29) | 63% (17/27) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 30% (10/33) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 100% (2/2) |
Return Points W% | 55% (33/60) | 36% (16/44) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mateas VS Chervinsky H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-1 |
Maria Mateas
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
27 of
60)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Maria Mateas | Elaine Chervinsky |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 64% (23/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 56% (187/147) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
Aces Total | 30 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
DFs Total | 28 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:1:50 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 320.63 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (796/1124) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 61% (488/796) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (170/328) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 54% (71/131) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 47% (516/1093) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (10/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Maria Mateas Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Kylie Mckenzie
Player
Maria Mateas
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Emina Bektas
Player
Maria Mateas
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maria Mateas
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Maria Mateas
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maria Mateas
Player
Ashley Lahey
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maria Mateas
Player
Jessie Aney
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Maria Mateas
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Tamira Paszek
Player
Maria Mateas
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
2
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maria Mateas
Player
Cadence Brace
70%
(
76 of
108)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maria Mateas
Player
Jessica Failla
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Elaine Chervinsky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Maria Mateas
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
27 of
60)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 0-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Victoria Hu
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
14
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Natasha Subhash
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Kimmi Hance
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Mackenzie Clark
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Sophia Hatton
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more