Y. Putintseva
To Win
M. Sakkari
To Win
Maria Sakkari vs Chloe Paquet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W L L
Form
L L W W W W L L L LHead-To-Head: Sakkari 2 - 0 Paquet
They have played 6 sets in total, with Sakkari winning 4 and Paquet winning 2. The last match between Sakkari and Paquet was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 05-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Maria Sakkari getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | 2 |
| Chloe Paquet | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome(05-05-2025)
Maria Sakkari
Chloe Paquet
4
6
6
3
6
2
| Sakkari | Stats | Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (14-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (14-21) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 86 | Ranking | 151 |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 96 |
| 29 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 7 |
| 60% (488-327) | Career Total W/L | 51% (424-407) |
| $9,163,521 | Career Prize Money | $442,085 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Walton VS Holt PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
21 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basavareddy VS Zandschulp PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
21 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Maria Sakkari
Player
Chloe Paquet
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Chloe Paquet
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
125)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
54 of
81)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
125)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 33 | Games Won | 28 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:28:53 | Average Match Time | 2:28:53 |
| 66% (131/197) | 1st Serve % | 65% (141/218) |
| 67% (88/131) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (91/141) |
| 53% (35/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (33/77) |
| 30% (9/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (7/21) |
| 43% (94/218) | Return Points Win % | 38% (74/197) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sakkari vs Paquet Match Preview :
Second serve performance may just be the backbone of any tennis match (or a hilarious way to keep the crowd guessing). Enter Paquet, who, for the last half-year’s worth of matches, has managed to triumph in a wallet-busting 40.9% of points when relying on their second serve. On the other side, Sakkari isn’t too far behind, with a barely perceptible difference at 40.33%. They’re like siblings fighting over the TV remote – both equally stubborn!
When it comes to the art of yoinking points from their opponents' second serves, Paquet has managed to nab 50.59% of them recently, showing off a delightful knack for the comeback. Sakkari, not to be outdone, comes with a reputable prowess, capturing 49.46% of such opportunities in the last few months, all while making their opponents look pensively at their rackets. First serve returns play a similar antics game, with Paquet pulling off 33.78% and Sakkari in comedic pursuit at 30.21%.
Now, imagine a pair of magicians presenting their finest ‘Alakazam!’ moments under pressure: Paquet can magically save almost half, 50.39% to be exact, of their breakpoints, while Sakkari humbly saves 48.7%, leaving the door slightly ajar for some drama. Meanwhile, the duo's historical competition is a classic film plot. They’ve met once, with Sakkari emerging like a victorious action hero. A romance of tennis where Sakkari has won two sets and Paquet settled for just one. The last showdown, a 2015 Istanbul nail-biter, ended with Sakkari edging through 3-6, 7-6(3), 7-5. It’s a two-hour, 34-minute drama fest, with Sakkari taking the decisive set in their one arena convention!
Judging by their recent history, Paquet blinks first in extreme pressure H2H situations, with a notable tiebreak swallowed whole by Sakkari’s win count of one. The mystical deciding set smiles down on Sakkari, who, like a determined marathon runner, claimed victory previously, while Paquet stands to break the dance routine they've found themselves in. Interestingly, if this match sails smoothly into a deciding set, Paquet may just find an edge having won 40% of their recent final sets compared to Sakkari’s 14% – a twist too rich for any novelist!
Let’s gossip about surface romances: Paquet can't help but waltz on clay, sizzling with a 53% success rate, whereas grass seems to play hard to get with a 40% win rate. Sakkari, meanwhile, dances gracefully with clay, taking charge with a holding of 63%, and even grass bows to them at a pleasing 57%—an impressive CV!
When it comes to entertaining audiences at different levels, Paquet's acts have graced the Challengers/ITF stage, earning applause 48.57% of the time, compared to Sakkari's escapades on the Main Tour, capturing hearts only 35.29% of the time. However, considering opponent caliber over the last year, Paquet’s foes have been commanding an average rank of 179.52, while Sakkari's much ballyhooed adversaries averaged at 80.59, making it seem like Paquet’s been taking a gentle stroll through amateur park while Sakkari’s been hustling in the pro jungle.
Like any great movie, this tennis match's ending may just lie in the numbers. Sakkari, with their stellar past form and war stories, is poised to seize triumph once again. As the curtain rises on this duel, predicting its outcome feels akin to teasing the punchline in a well-loved sitcom, with all signs pointing towards Sakkari for the encore!
Sakkari vs Paquet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maria Sakkari Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maria Sakkari
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Maria Sakkari
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Maria Sakkari
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Maria Sakkari
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Belinda Bencic
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve %
55%
(
12 of
22)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
26
Total Points Won
15
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Maja Chwalinska
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Chloe Paquet
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Chloe Paquet
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
79
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Chloe Paquet
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
46%
(
52 of
112)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
14
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
51%
(
45 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
57 of
112)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
73 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Chloe Paquet
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
3
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
77%
(
63 of
82)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Amanda Anisimova
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
56
|
3-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Kimberly Birrell
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
10
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
12
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (488/327) | Win/Loss | 51% (424/407) |
| 58% (1089/775) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (997/933) |
| 53% (9064/7895) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9056/8677) |
| 59% (241/168) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (96/104) |
| 63% (185/110) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (248/218) |
| 56% (32/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (74/75) |
| 56% (30/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1697 | Aces Total | 1998 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1790 | Total Double Faults | 2823 |
| 1:7:37 | Average Match Time | 1:13:16 |
| 389.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 472.17 |
| 62% (23647/38309) | 1st Serve % | 59% (24482/41250) |
| 64% (15246/23647) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (15685/24482) |
| 47% (6928/14650) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7419/16768) |
| 45% (2087/4677) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2224/4906) |
| 44% (16973/38391) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18544/41813) |
| 60% (58/38) | Slam W/L | 30% (12/28) |
| 60% (103/69) | Masters W/L | 17% (2/10) |
| 44% (4/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (121/101) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (42/61) |
| 59% (85/58) | Challenger W/L | 54% (273/234) |
| 68% (117/56) | Futures W/L | 56% (95/74) |
| 60% (480/802) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (419/819) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 55% (90/164) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (89/178) |
| 51% (122/239) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (119/268) |
| 88% (482/422) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (450/361) |
| 12% (482/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (450/88) |
| 20% (333/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (381/61) |
Sakkari vs. Paquet Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
