M. Mateas
To Win
M. C. O. Serrano
To Win
Maria Mateas vs Kajsa Rinaldo Persson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L L W W
Form
L W L W L L L W L WHead-2-Head: Mateas 2 - 0 Persson
They have played 6 sets in total, with Mateas winning 4 and Persson winning 2. The last match between Mateas and Persson was at the W50 Zephyrhills, 15-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Maria Mateas getting the victory 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maria Mateas | 2 |
| Kajsa Rinaldo Persson | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Zephyrhills(15-04-2025)
Maria Mateas
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
2
6
7
6
7
5
| Mateas | Stats | Persson |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (15-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (10-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 243 | Ranking | 332 |
| 190 | Highest Rank | 288 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 6 |
| 55% (241-197) | Career Total W/L | 60% (248-166) |
| $13,868 | Career Prize Money | $4,080 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats 
Maria Mateas
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
74%
(
79 of
107)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 3-6 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
51%
(
39 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 31 | Games Won | 27 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 2:50:53 | Average Match Time | 2:50:53 |
| 67% (123/183) | 1st Serve % | 66% (119/181) |
| 55% (68/123) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (70/119) |
| 42% (25/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (24/62) |
| 60% (15/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (14/25) |
| 48% (87/181) | Return Points Win % | 49% (90/183) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mateas vs Persson Match Preview :
In a world where tennis matches double as comedy routines, we find Persson and Mateas squaring off with their second serves ready to do some salsa moves. Persson seems to tango a bit better, winning 45.36% of points on their second serve in the last six months, while Mateas is trailing slightly behind with a 40.03% success rate. It's a stat so accurate at predicting match outcomes that some say it doubles as a fortune teller.
When it comes to returning gifts (or, you know, the opponent's serve), Persson is slightly more polite, winning 50.26% of opponent's second serve points compared to Mateas’s charming 49.32%. The first serve return stats are neck-and-neck like twins lost in a crowd, with Persson at 32.87% and Mateas lurking just behind at 32.54%. Is there a magician who can make predictions more accurate? Probably not.
Under pressure, Persson is about as calm as a cat watching a laser pointer, saving 44.91% of breakpoints, while Mateas, cool as a cucumber, saves 56.64%. It's a crucial stat for those who love to place their in-game bets like they’re picking their favorite ice cream flavor under pressure.
In the grand scheme of tennis life, Persson has won 68.52% of matches over the past year with a respectable record of 37 wins to 17 losses. Mateas, while not too shabby, comes in with a slightly less robust 52.86% success rate, clocking a 37 to 33 win-loss record. It leads you to wonder who’s the real party animal on the court.
Their preferred surfaces reveal a bit about who brings the sunshine and who enjoys a rainy day. Persson shines brightest on indoor hard courts with a 62% win rate (49 wins to 30 losses), while Mateas finds joy on plain hard courts, also with a 58% success rate. But when life hands them the indoor hard courts, Mateas’s luck seems to dim at 50%.
Both players have been elbow-deep in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K circuit, with Persson winning 69.23% of those matches. Mateas, managing a 54.41% victory stretch, seems to party slightly less often. These stats translate into insights on who’s got the better dance moves per event level they've twirled around.
In the rare occurrence when they’ve danced together on the court (or faced off in serious matches), Mateas has been victorious on every headline trophy, which by "all the time" we mean just one time, with their last joyful encounter at Bol, where clay courts probably gave them a musical advantage with a 3-6 6-2 6-2 win.
Their head-to-head matches average 2 hours and 15 minutes, enough time to binge a couple of sitcom episodes. But if this match hits a deciding set, Persson, who’s managed to win 52% of them in the past 12 months, might just win the match in the blink of a Wilson-branded eye compared to Mateas’s 39%.
If we take the players’ battle-ready break point conversions into account, Mateas has sparingly turned 45.59% of them into delightful victories, while Persson converts at 40%, keeping fans on the edges of their seats, contemplating delicious hypothetical outcomes.
Gather all these stats like shiny seashells on a beach, and the tide seems to be expecting Persson to masterfully surf to victory. So, when the tennis court becomes their stage, a smiling Persson is likely to waltz away with the win, leaving audiences chuckling under the sun. Prediction: Persson triumphs!
Mateas vs Persson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maria Mateas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Arantxa Rus
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martha Matoula
Player
Maria Mateas
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Maria Mateas
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Alana Smith
69%
(
76 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Maria Mateas
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Maria Mateas
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
52
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
74%
(
79 of
107)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Francisca Jorge
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
14 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
44
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Lia Karatancheva
77%
(
79 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
103
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caty McNally
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
69%
(
74 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
51%
(
55 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
74%
(
79 of
107)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diletta Cherubini
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Martina Okalova
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
75%
(
82 of
109)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (241/197) | Win/Loss | 60% (248/166) |
| 55% (551/452) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (554/391) |
| 53% (4887/4400) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4614/3927) |
| 58% (126/93) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (57/42) |
| 53% (101/90) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (142/94) |
| 50% (14/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (49/30) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 502 | Aces Total | 308 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1622 | Total Double Faults | 1386 |
| 1:44:56 | Average Match Time | 1:7:20 |
| 487.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 487.71 |
| 66% (17405/26251) | 1st Serve % | 65% (11937/18477) |
| 60% (10472/17405) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7189/11937) |
| 43% (3839/8846) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2843/6541) |
| 49% (1635/3349) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1304/2632) |
| 47% (12199/26123) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9014/18659) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 30% (3/7) | Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 54% (208/174) | Challenger W/L | 59% (111/77) |
| 67% (28/14) | Futures W/L | 63% (132/79) |
| 55% (235/425) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (242/403) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 53% (55/103) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (42/81) |
| 46% (61/132) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (61/125) |
| 85% (243/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (258/218) |
| 14% (243/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (258/36) |
| 17% (195/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (155/27) |
Mateas vs. Persson Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
