Maria Mateas vs Elizabeth Mandlik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W L L L
Form
W L W W W L W W W LH2H: Mateas 3 - 0 Mandlik
They have played 8 sets in total, with Mateas winning 6 and Mandlik winning 2. The last match between Mateas and Mandlik was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat, 20-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Maria Mateas getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maria Mateas | 3 |
| Elizabeth Mandlik | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat(20-05-2025)
Maria Mateas
Elizabeth Mandlik
6
3
6
4
| Mateas | Stats | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (15-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (19-11) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 236 | Ranking | 255 |
| 190 | Highest Rank | 97 |
| 25 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 8 |
| 55% (241-200) | Career Total W/L | 56% (183-142) |
| $13,868 | Career Prize Money | $317,135 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sonego VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Maria Mateas
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 7-5 1-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-0 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
77%
(
62 of
81)
1st Serve %
38%
(
26 of
68)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 41 | Games Won | 29 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
| 1:23:41 | Average Match Time | 1:23:41 |
| 73% (122/167) | 1st Serve % | 48% (65/136) |
| 58% (71/122) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (36/65) |
| 44% (20/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (24/71) |
| 65% (13/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (7/26) |
| 56% (76/136) | Return Points Win % | 46% (76/167) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mateas vs Mandlik Match Preview :
- Second serve performance has been closely matched, with Mateas winning 39.46% of points and Mandlik slightly better at 39.57% over the last six months. Can this minor difference influence the outcome significantly?
- In return games, Mandlik excels, capturing 56.13% of opponents' second-serve points, while Mateas secures 47.95%. This might suggest a potential edge for Mandlik in return strength.
- When analyzing matches on the first serve, Mandlik's slight advantage is evident, converting 37.44% of points compared to Mateas’ 36.75%.
- Mateas has a notable ability to save breakpoints at 51.56%, while Mandlik saves 46.25%. How might this resilience for Mateas influence high-pressure scenarios?
- Overall match performance in the past year sees Mandlik ahead with a win rate of 53.45%, compared to Mateas' 50.77%.
- Both players prefer Hard surfaces; Mateas achieves a 58% win rate versus Mandlik's 59%.
- Direct head-to-head records show Mateas has consistently defeated Mandlik in both prior encounters, winning 4 out of 6 sets.
- Neither player has excelled in tiebreaks against each other, as no tiebreaks have occurred in their matches.
- Considering the quality of opponents faced, Mandlik has competed against higher-ranked opponents, with an average opponent rank of 283.05 compared to Mateas’ 312.54.
- In deciding sets over the last 12 months, Mateas has a higher success rate at 42%, compared to Mandlik's 36%.
- Both players convert breakpoints well, with Mateas slightly ahead at 44.58% versus Mandlik’s 42.71%.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
Based on the available statistics, the upcoming match between Mateas and Mandlik promises to be competitive. Mandlik holds a marginal advantage in return games, showing exceptional performance on second-serve returns. This could be pivotal if it disturbs Mateas' service games.
However, Mateas exhibits resilience in saving breakpoints, which may counteract Mandlik's return advantage. The direct head-to-head records heavily favor Mateas, suggesting psychological and strategic insights that might not be reflected in other statistics.
Although Mandlik has encountered stronger opponents recently, it may not compensate for Mateas' successful track record against her. Overall, due to head-to-head dominance and superior breakpoint resilience, Mateas is predicted to likely emerge victorious in their upcoming match.
Mateas vs Mandlik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maria Mateas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Maria Mateas
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
74%
(
74 of
100)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
80
|
6-0 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Maria Mateas
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
52%
(
42 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
79
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Maria Mateas
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Arantxa Rus
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martha Matoula
Player
Maria Mateas
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Maria Mateas
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Alana Smith
69%
(
76 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Josy Daems
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Vivian Wolff
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Antonia Schmidt
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
116)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
57 of
116)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Sada Nahimana
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Lea Boskovic
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (241/200) | Win/Loss | 56% (183/142) |
| 55% (553/458) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (417/340) |
| 53% (4914/4442) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3667/3286) |
| 57% (126/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (101/69) |
| 53% (101/91) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (72/59) |
| 50% (14/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 502 | Aces Total | 518 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 1636 | Total Double Faults | 1380 |
| 1:45:3 | Average Match Time | 1:32:56 |
| 487.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 392.21 |
| 66% (17586/26500) | 1st Serve % | 56% (11755/21060) |
| 60% (10570/17586) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7318/11755) |
| 43% (3862/8914) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4170/9304) |
| 49% (1646/3374) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1408/2725) |
| 47% (12292/26342) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9983/20976) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 50% (11/11) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 25% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 54% (208/175) | Challenger W/L | 55% (103/85) |
| 67% (28/14) | Futures W/L | 72% (42/16) |
| 55% (235/428) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (180/321) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (56/104) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (22/61) |
| 46% (61/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (57/111) |
| 84% (244/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (177/155) |
| 15% (244/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (177/22) |
| 17% (197/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (148/28) |
Mateas vs. Mandlik Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
