M. H. Gonzalez
To Win
A. K. Toth
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L L W W WForm
W W W L L W W W L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Gonzalez winning 2 and Mair winning 0. The last match between Gonzalez and Mair was at the W15 Manacor, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Maria Herazo Gonzalez getting the victory 7-6(0) 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Maria Herazo Gonzalez | 1 |
Laura Mair | 0 |
W15 Manacor(19-02-2025)
Gonzalez | Stats | Mair |
---|---|---|
67% (4-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (6-8) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
673 | Ranking | 708 |
317 | Highest Rank | 690 |
28 | Age | 22 |
- | Plays | - |
12 | Titles | 1 |
57% (295-227) | Career Total W/L | 47% (93-104) |
$4,420 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
- / Second
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(0) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
Player
Laura Mair
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve %
58%
(
11 of
19)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
15
Total Points Won
15
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
0:23:7 | Average Match Time | 0:23:7 |
91% (10/11) | 1st Serve % | 58% (11/19) |
60% (6/10) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (7/11) |
0% (0/1) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (3/8) |
50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
47% (9/19) | Return Points Win % | 45% (5/11) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions based on recent form: In the past six months, there has been a clear distinction in the second serve performance of Gonzalez and Mair. Gonzalez has managed to secure victory on 50% of their second serve points, surpassing Mair's 44.88% success rate. The importance of this statistical observation cannot be overstated, as it exhibits a significant correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Evaluating return game stats: When scrutinizing the return game statistics, we unearth fascinating insights regarding the recent form of Gonzalez and Mair. Gonzalez has triumphed in an impressive 57.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mair stands at a respectable 54.34%. As for first serve returns, Gonzalez holds a commendable record of 47.51%, whereas Mair trails slightly behind at 41.5%. Understanding these figures is crucial in determining the favored contender in their head-to-head confrontation.
Thriving under pressure: In analyzing how well players perform under pressure, Gonzalez has demonstrated resilience by saving 45.76% of breakpoints in recent matches. In comparison, Mair has showcased an even more remarkable ability, saving 55.49% of breakpoints. This particular statistic proves to be invaluable when making predictions for in-game betting.
Taking a comprehensive overview: Examining the broader scope of their performance, we discover that over the past year, Gonzalez has emerged victorious in 51.02% of matches played (25 wins, 24 losses), while Mair's success rate stands at a solid 50% (26 wins, 26 losses). Such an overview provides a useful prediction framework for their forthcoming clash.
Unveiling the best-suited surface: Analyzing each player's performance on different surfaces yields intriguing results. Gonzalez has found unparalleled success on Clay courts, boasting an impressive win percentage of 59% (232 wins, 159 losses). In contrast, their proficiency on I.hard surfaces falls dramatically, with only a 20% win rate (2 wins, 8 losses). Mair, on the other hand, has excelled on Clay courts, witnessing victory in 54% of matches (61 wins, 53 losses). However, their performance on I.hard surfaces drops to a 31% win rate (8 wins, 18 losses). This surface analysis is vital in gauging each player's strengths and weaknesses.
Consideration of player level: Taking into account the level of events in which they have competed, we observe that Gonzalez has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K category. Within this realm, they have achieved success in 48.39% of matches played (15 wins, 16 losses). Conversely, Mair has primarily engaged in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, triumphing in 53.33% of matches (16 wins, 14 losses). When evaluating player statistics to determine favoritism, it is essential to contextualize their performance within the respective event levels.
Opponent quality scrutinized: Comparing the quality of opponents faced by each player over the past 12 months, Gonzalez has encountered adversaries with an average ranking of 355. Mair, on the other hand, has confronted players with an average ranking of 363.88. This insight sheds light on the level of competition each player has faced and contributes to predictive analysis.
Analyzing deciding set performance: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, it is vital to consider how players fare in deciding sets. Over the past year, Gonzalez has managed to triumph in 30% of deciding sets, whereas Mair possesses a commendable 48% success rate for all matches played on tour. These statistics provide valuable foresight into potential outcomes.
Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performances undoubtedly play a role in predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to evaluate current event statistics to identify in-form players. For detailed insights into the ongoing event, please refer to the section below. Furthermore, it is essential to acknowledge that certain players may exhibit superior performance levels at specific events, influencing the overall outcome.
Break point conversion: Recent data uncovers fascinating details regarding breakpoint conversion rates. Gonzalez has displayed remarkable prowess by capitalizing on 52.38% of their breakpoint opportunities, surpassing Mair's 45.3% conversion rate. This particular statistic becomes exceedingly significant when making in-game live betting assessments during crucial moments of the match.
If you have an affinity for models that project tennis match outcomes, this article offers an excellent starting point. However, be advised—only avid statistics enthusiasts shall fully appreciate its contents.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
Player
Laura Mair
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve %
58%
(
11 of
19)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
15
Total Points Won
15
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jimar Gerald Gonzalez
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
14 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
Player
Julia Julia Cerqueira Carvalho Farias Lima
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
30%
(
9 of
30)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve %
67%
(
14 of
21)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
28
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
Player
Valentina Mediorreal Arias
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luna Vujovic
Player
Laura Mair
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Stefania Bojica
Player
Laura Mair
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
40%
(
21 of
52)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Laura Mair
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Mair
Player
Vlada Katic
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
76%
(
57 of
75)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Mair
Player
Eleni Chatziavraam
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Paris Corley
Player
Laura Mair
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
Player
Laura Mair
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve %
58%
(
11 of
19)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
15
Total Points Won
15
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-7(4) 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57% (295/227) | Win/Loss | 47% (93/104) |
56% (647/517) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (217/237) |
52% (5458/4964) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (2067/2135) |
51% (56/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 39% (18/28) |
59% (235/160) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (64/55) |
24% (4/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 34% (11/21) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
263 | Aces Total | 208 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.42 |
1508 | Total Double Faults | 852 |
1:22:49 | Average Match Time | 1:15:33 |
498.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 398.11 |
68% (18536/27074) | 1st Serve % | 55% (5657/10200) |
58% (10832/18536) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (3515/5657) |
44% (3760/8524) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (1883/4543) |
49% (1724/3531) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (580/1194) |
47% (12564/26629) | Return Points Win % | 45% (4578/10262) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
43% (6/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
25% (2/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
46% (109/129) | Challenger W/L | 44% (35/44) |
68% (178/83) | Futures W/L | 49% (58/60) |
56% (289/513) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (91/195) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
55% (41/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (15/38) |
51% (65/127) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (27/60) |
89% (297/263) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (93/76) |
11% (297/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (93/17) |
14% (225/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (104/16) |
View full predicted draw for Gonzalez