Maria Golovina vs Margot Phanthala Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W W L
Form
W L W W L W W L L LHead-To-Head: Golovina 1 - 0 Phanthala
They have played 3 sets in total, with Golovina winning 2 and Phanthala winning 1. The last match between Golovina and Phanthala was at the W50 Ahmedabad, 25-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Maria Golovina getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maria Golovina | 1 |
| Margot Phanthala | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Ahmedabad(25-02-2025)
Maria Golovina
Margot Phanthala
6
3
2
6
6
0
| Golovina | Stats | Phanthala |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (16-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (5-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 572 | Ranking | N/A |
| 572 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 17 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 68% (46-22) | Career Total W/L | 41% (19-27) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vekic VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Rakhimova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Maria Golovina
Player
Margot Phanthala
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:4:17 | Average Match Time | 2:4:17 |
| 54% (39/72) | 1st Serve % | 50% (46/92) |
| 74% (29/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (27/46) |
| 52% (17/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (20/46) |
| 33% (5/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 49% (45/92) | Return Points Win % | 36% (26/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Golovina vs Phanthala Match Preview :
As we dive into the tantalizing arena of this tennis match, let's examine the recent performances of Phanthala and Golovina. Their stats over the last six months unfold a narrative of contrasts and insights that could guide our prediction. Phanthala claims an edge with a 49.43% win rate on second serve points, surpassing Golovina's 43.58%. Could this subtle advantage in second serve proficiency be a prediction of dominance on the court?
Analyzing return game performance further shows that Phanthala wins 65.95% of her opponents' second serve points, which eclipses Golovina's 59.97%. Yet, Golovina's first serve return success of 45.78% is higher than Phanthala's 41.75%, spinning a tale of mixed strengths. The statistics reveal Phanthala has saved 48.48% of breakpoints, while Golovina impressively defends 55.09% of them, offering a glimpse into their resilience under pressure.
Moving to their performance overview of the past year, Phanthala, with a win rate of 38.89% (7/11 W/L), lags behind Golovina's commanding 68.29% (28/13 W/L). This sets a stage of disparity in their match outcomes. Additionally, while both players find their best success on hard courts, Phanthala's best surface win rate of 48% still pales compared to Golovina's robust 69% on the same surface.
The level of competition faced by Phanthala also plays a role, having competed mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a 33.33% win rate (5/10 W/L), whereas Golovina thrives at the same level, boasting a 66.67% win rate (22/11 W/L). Furthermore, Phanthala's encounters typically involve higher-ranked players (average rank 298.5) compared to Golovina's average opponent rank of 438.95, providing perspective on their competitive landscapes.
In the tension of deciding sets, Golovina showcases superior mental fortitude, claiming victory in 50% of such situations—an aspect where Phanthala triumphed just 20% of the time over the last year. As they approach breakpoint conversion, however, they show closely aligned potential, with Phanthala converting 56.92% and Golovina slightly trailing at 52.96%.
Considering these diverse elements, one might ask: who has the upper hand? While proximity in breakpoint success hints at potential surprises, Golovina's statistical strengths in victory rates, surface mastery, and resilience in deciding sets suggest she is more likely to emerge victorious in this matchup. Every swing and return will matter, but these insights lean toward Golovina as the favorite to seize triumph on the court.
Golovina vs Phanthala Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maria Golovina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aliona Falei
Player
Maria Golovina
59%
(
73 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
4 of
27)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
59 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
54 of
87)
118
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Golovina
Player
Urszula Radwanska
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Golovina
Player
Daria Zelinskaya
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Golovina
Player
Vera Deepoem
51%
(
43 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Guerrero Alvarez
Player
Maria Golovina
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Golovina
Player
Holly Hutchinson
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maria Golovina
Player
Emma Slavikova
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
61
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mei Yamaguchi
Player
Maria Golovina
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Margot Phanthala Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Margot Phanthala
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zuzanna Pawlikowska
Player
Margot Phanthala
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
100%
(
3 of
3)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
1
Total Points Won
2
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Golovina
Player
Margot Phanthala
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margot Phanthala
Player
Laalitya Kalluri
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margot Phanthala
Player
Lakshmi Gowda
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Margot Phanthala
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margot Phanthala
Player
Helena Stevic
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (46/22) | Win/Loss | 41% (19/27) |
| 65% (100/53) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (47/57) |
| 55% (771/624) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (469/498) |
| 69% (40/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (19/24) |
| 63% (5/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 79 | Aces Total | 14 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 221 | Total Double Faults | 155 |
| 1:29:29 | Average Match Time | 1:28:45 |
| 368.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 356.04 |
| 64% (2581/4016) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1565/2446) |
| 61% (1565/2581) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (871/1565) |
| 42% (606/1435) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (379/881) |
| 53% (310/581) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (145/292) |
| 50% (2015/4023) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1093/2397) |
| 70% (16/7) | Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 67% (30/15) | Futures W/L | 39% (15/23) |
| 67% (45/67) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (19/46) |
| 83% (5/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 50% (9/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (3/12) |
| 93% (45/42) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (21/17) |
| 7% (45/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (21/4) |
| 17% (23/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (25/2) |
Golovina vs. Phanthala Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
